Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: donjuan_demarco who wrote (42676)	10/4/2000 6:18:17 PM
From: Shoot1st	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

that's not what I was asking..... how many would die if they gave birth.....or is that too inconvenient for them? Shootie

To: donjuan_demarco who wrote (42676)	10/4/2000 6:37:13 PM
From: Shoot1st	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

The right to choose... Let's see... they chose to be irresponsible about birth control they chose men that were equally guilty and perhaps even adamant about....'not wearing a raincoat in the shower" they chose to not to screw around when they had the wrong circumstances for raising a child they chose to ignore the thought of adoption they chose not to have to discuss this with the "fathers" they chose not to discuss this with their parents, if feasible I'm a bit in a hurry and I'm sure I can think of more "choses" Doesn't it seem as though those making the "choice" are not very good at it. So we put the lives of unborn babies in the hands of those who can't do too many things right....including the man in the picture. I think, that if your statistics are correct, and every woman thought she had a 90% death rate if she "chose" to kill the fetus.....there would be far less.....way far less unplanned and unwanted pregnancies...... the cart is so far before the horse the freakin' horse doesn't even know who he belongs to. Shootie