SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : QLT PhotoTherapeutics (QLTI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Edward W. Richmond who wrote (1018)10/4/2000 7:57:15 PM
From: George Mc Geary  Respond to of 1321
 
>>"Gerzonowicz predicts sales for QLT will be "robust" next year, but in two to four years from now, it depends on the competition, he said."<<

WHO CARES ABOUT 2-4 YEARS FROM NOW. I WILL BE OUT OF THE STOCK BY THEN (My10 year rule, bot this on 1-13-93). It will be gone by 2-2003. I will be gone when it hits 100$ for 2500+% gain.

Today was a great buying opportunity offered by someone who did a survey of 40 doctors, NOT 400, NOT 4000, but 40. Wonder what their "margin of error" could be?

What a nice opportunity to double my position, buy some call options for what I feel will be a short term gain of 50% within a few months. We should be back to the 75, maybe 80$ range by the end of the year if we can find a bottom to this market in the next 30 days.

THANK YOU Leerink Swann & Co. analysts Robert Uhl and Navroze Alphonse.



To: Edward W. Richmond who wrote (1018)10/4/2000 8:12:00 PM
From: Ian@SI  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1321
 
Well Ed, If anyone watches CBC Businessworld in Canada, you may get another opportunity tomorrow.

Fred Langan, the host of the show (his qualification is that he has nicer hair than the braindead host he replaced) described noname LeDink's downgrade as if it were an earnings warning issued by QLT.

While I fully recognize that CBC (the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation) hosts have a difficult time spelling biznuss let alone understanding it, it would be nice if they could distinguish between idle speculation by an organization that may well have ulteriour motives, and, an official news release from a company.

What utterly disgusting incompetence.

And perhaps I'll get another chance to be well rewarded if anyone neglects doing their DD and just accepts the nonsense spouted by Fred.

FWIW,
Ian.