SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Meathead who wrote (161677)10/4/2000 10:51:09 PM
From: Selectric II  Respond to of 176387
 
Well stated.



To: Meathead who wrote (161677)10/4/2000 11:04:36 PM
From: calgal  Respond to of 176387
 
I agree. That was very well said.



To: Meathead who wrote (161677)10/4/2000 11:31:05 PM
From: Bill Jackson  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 176387
 
Meathead. Dell had to make some advance comment once he knew what would happen. Litigious class action lawyers have made this necessary in this day and age.
One now needs to lay the blame for this. Was it an industry wide decline? or was it an Intel wide decline? If it was an Intel wide decline then Mikey is to be faulted by not diversifying Dell's product mix to include AMD parts?
Why did he not diversify? was it because AMD parts are no good? No, it was probably because AMD cannot deliver enough parts to satisfy both those who have committed to AMD this past year as well as Dell. AMD is showing the same loyalty to it's clients that Dell showed to Intel. This means that dell will have only second rate offerings until next year at the earliest. By second rate I mean 20% or more slower than those that espouse AMD chips.
Saying that dell does offer fast Intel parts is a useless defence as we all know they are not making commitments to ship in a timely manner.

So in effect Mikey Dell made a gamble and lost badly, he bet the company and now those chickens are coming home to roost.
We could see 40% or more knocked off Dells cap very soon?
Cap that will be slow to return.

bill



To: Meathead who wrote (161677)10/4/2000 11:34:50 PM
From: SecularBull  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
Thank you, Meathead, for removing the emotional subjectivity from the discussion. I agree with you.

Regards,

LoF



To: Meathead who wrote (161677)10/5/2000 7:16:49 PM
From: Skeeter Bug  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 176387
 
mh, the problem with nutso valuations is that near misses mean 60-70% wacks out of the stock price. dell was risky at much higher valuations, people rolled the dice on this bet (and it was a bet at much higher prices) and lost. pc rev growth has been declining for some time. it is now catching up to dell.

the trend is that rev growth is shrinking, period. who follows the trend?

as for assuaging the taste of crow...

biz.yahoo.com

count up the dollars mr dell & company just sold to whoever was buying... ;-) i'll bet it buys a mighty tasty chaser for that crow...