Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (42885)	10/5/2000 10:27:39 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

First, it would not matter if Paula Jones were a slut, to the substantive issue of whether or not she were harassed in a given instance. Second, it does not matter if Glavin is a groper to the substantive issue of whether Clinton should be disbarred for perjury. Third, no one who read the Starr report could regard it as titillating, and therefore it was not pornographic. Fourth, there is no doubt that Clinton stained Monica's dress: he conceded as much after the DNA testing. Why, then, would you say "I guess that Clinton may have stained Lewinsky's dress", as if it were a disputable matter? No, the stain on the Republic is the willingness of people like you to go to any lengths to defend William Jefferson Clinton.........