SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (59390)10/5/2000 11:18:51 AM
From: Enigma  Respond to of 116764
 
Well of course I hope you're right about the POG etc - but as regards price the POG and Dollar are to some extent the inverse of each other.



To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (59390)10/5/2000 12:53:14 PM
From: Alex  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 116764
 
Gold's Slide Triggers Exit by Long-Patient Investors: Spotlight
By Claudia Carpenter

Denver, Oct. 5 (Bloomberg) -- The president of Canadian gold mining company Cambior Inc. said this week that the past year was the worst of his life. The CEO of Franco-Nevada Mining Corp. said many of the world's gold producers simply can't make money.

It's little wonder that Stephen Mitchell, the chief investment officer for Ohio's $57 billion State Teachers Retirement System, finds himself among an ever-shrinking group: gold investors.

Stocks of gold-mining companies have plunged as the price of the precious metal lingered near its lowest level in two decades. Investors have removed an estimated $8 billion, or two-thirds of their money, from gold mutual funds since 1995. Only the most optimistic gold bugs or long-term investors are staying put.

``We knew we were going to have to be patient because we didn't go into this with the idea that gold was going to rebound immediately,'' said Mitchell, who spent $30 million from the pension fund he helps run for 400,000 teachers on shares of companies such as Newmont Mining Corp. and Barrick Gold Corp.

``We just felt that gold was trading at historically low levels, and that maybe it was overdone,'' Mitchell said. ``The important part is that we've been buying on the way down.''

Of course, buying on the way down only helps if prices go up. So far, that hasn't happened much. The price of gold, which fetches about $270 an ounce now, is half of what it was in 1980, and it's dropped almost 30 percent in the past five years.

`Worst'

``The past year has been the worst 12 months of my life,'' said Louis Gignac, president of Montreal-based Cambior, which made a wrong-way bet on gold prices last year and saw its stock drop 86 percent in the past 14 months. The company now has $165 million of debt and a market value of about $27 million.

Others in the industry have fared little better, though some remain profitable. The S&P Gold Index of leading gold mining stocks has fallen during eight out of the past 10 years, losing half its value since 1980. It's down 23 percent this year.

``If we have another 10 years of low gold prices, the industry won't exist as we know it,'' said Trevor Steel, who manages the $10 million Mercury Gold and Mining Fund, a London- based mutual fund that is part of Merrill Lynch & Co.

Plenty of investors aren't willing to wait that long. The $10 billion U.S. Steel and Carnegie Pension Fund sold what was left of its $10 million in gold stocks earlier this year, said Gary Glynn, the fund's president and chief investment officer.

``We've held them for quite a while,'' Glynn said. ``For us, it was a very small piece of our portfolio.''

At the 13th annual Mining Investment Forum in Denver this week, the turnout by investors was ``pretty depressing,'' said Bernard Swanepoel, chief executive of South Africa's Harmony Gold Mining Co. ``It looks like the attendance is at an all-time low. It's difficult to be optimistic.''

Funds Shrink

Just $4 billion is left in gold-stock mutual funds worldwide, down from $12 billion five years ago, said Robert Van Doorn, a mining analyst at Vancouver-based research firm Loewen, Ondaatje, McCutcheon Ltd. During that period, the market value of the industry fell to $40 billion from $60 billion, he said.

Gold prices probably will average about $270 an ounce for the next three years, which suggests that mining companies, even after recent declines, still are overvalued, said Peter Ward, a gold company analyst at Lehman Brothers.

Gold traditionally has been bought at times of high inflation or military conflict, when stocks, bonds and currencies can falter. Yet tame inflation has reduced the allure of gold, and investments like insured money market accounts are easier and cheaper places for skittish investors to park their money. Even central banks, the biggest holders of gold, have unloaded reserves by selling or lending the metal to investors.

To stay profitable, gold mining companies from South Africa to Canada to Australia have slashed production costs and tried to boost output. They've also sought to lock in profitable prices by selling metal that they borrow from central banks or making arrangements to deliver gold at a later date that they have yet to mine. That simply means more gold is available to buy, helping to keep prices low.

That's hurt gold-mining companies. Just two of the six biggest producers in North America, Barrick and Placer Dome Inc., will be profitable this year, said Lehman's Ward.

``This industry is in shambles,'' said Seymour Schulich, chief executive of Toronto-based Franco-Nevada Mining. ``None of these producers can make money at current gold prices. This industry is sitting on deck eight of the Titanic. Nobody believes they're going to get wet.''

Golden Expectations

Indeed, many producers expect gold prices to rise, though they are quick to point out they have no idea when that will occur.

``We believe in gold,'' said Jack Thompson, chief executive of Homestake Mining Co. ``We believe gold will rise again. I am not going to make a prediction about gold because I've been disappointed too many times. I've been humbled.''

Franco-Nevada's Schulich says he expects gold to reach $400 an ounce ``in a couple of years,'' and his company wants to increase its leverage to gold through mergers and acquisitions of mines.

With many companies expecting price rises, ``you still get a sense there's a 'don't worry, be happy' sentiment out there,'' said Douglas Pollitt, an analyst at the brokerage Pollitt & Co. in Toronto.

So who's left to invest in gold companies?

August Von Fink of Germany, one of the world's richest men with a net worth of $5.2 billion, according to Forbes magazine, has spend $33 million since 1997 buying a 13 percent stake in Walnut Creek, California-based Homestake, CEO Thompson said.

Von Fink, who spent $9 a share for a stock that now fetches $4.63, wanted exposure to gold ``because he is quite concerned about the European monetary union and the stability of currencies in Europe,'' Thompson said. Gold, since it's priced in dollars, rises in value when other currencies fall. ``This is a defensive investment,'' he said.

At Ohio's State Teachers Retirement System, Mitchell lumps his gold holdings with the $850 million he considers ``alternative investments,'' the ones that he hopes will deliver 15 percent annual returns over 10 years.

Mitchell declined to disclose returns on his gold holdings, but said they have tracked the Philadelphia gold and silver index, which is down 28 percent this year and reached an all-time low this week.

He said he sold some of the Newmont stock during a short- lived rally in the spring.



©2000 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Terms of Service, Privacy Policy and Trademarks.

quote.bloomberg.com



To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (59390)6/6/2001 7:58:05 AM
From: long-gone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116764
 
Tuesday May 15, 1:45 pm Eastern Time
MotleyFool.com - Fool on the Hill
Fool on the Hill: Where Has Corporate Integrity Gone?
By Whitney Tilson

Integrity: "Adherence to moral and ethical principles; soundness of moral character; honesty."

There are few things I value as highly as a reputation for integrity: both my own and that of the people and institutions I deal with. It's so important, yet so fragile. Such a reputation is built up over a lifetime, but can be destroyed in seconds. Just open the newspaper and look at the countless politicians, celebrities, and corporations that have had fine reputations tarnished by a moment of indiscretion.



A smoothly functioning investment system depends on integrity: of financial statements, of corporate leaders, of lawyers, bankers, and the media. Recently, I've become increasingly distressed by the appalling breakdown of integrity in this system. I think my feelings have something to do with recently attending the Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.A - news) and Wesco (AMEX: WSC - news) annual meetings, where I heard two exceptionally high-integrity people, Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger, talk about investing, management, and life in general for more than seven hours. (See my previous two columns for my notes on these meetings.)

It's sad that the refreshing honesty of these two men stands in such stark contrast to the excessive promotion -- if not deception or worse -- by so many other CEOs and those in the investment business. Beyond the daily hype on Wall Street and in the media, here are a few of the things I've read about just in the past two weeks that are making my stomach turn.

Exploiting the vulnerable
When wealthy, educated people get caught up in an investment bubble and lose a lot of money -- as many did in 1999 and 2000 -- my sympathy is limited. But those who prey on people at the other end of the spectrum are truly evil. Consider a cover story in today's New York Times, Immigrants Are Targets of Investment Schemes (free registration required), which details how unscrupulous immigrants swindled fellow countrymen out of their savings.

By itself, this is not unusual: So-called affinity fraud, according to the article, is "the second most common investment fraud in the country." But in this case, the brokers weren't from some fly-by-night operation, they were from UBS PaineWebber!

Another example of exploiting the vulnerable involves the often-notorious lending practices of many subprime mortgage lenders such as Associates First Capital, now owned by Citigroup (NYSE: C - news). (Consumer Reports wrote about this issue and a Treasury Under Secretary testified about it to Congress).

"Can we ever trust Wall Street again?"
That was the title of the cover story of the latest issue of Fortune, which has three revealing articles on:

The IPO con game of 1999 and 2000 ("Betrayal on Wall Street"). Excerpt: "Instead of selling shares to those willing to pay the most, Wall Street handed the underpriced stock to a privileged group of institutions that trade heavily with the investment banks." The SEC, among others, is currently investigating whether the banks illegally tied excessive brokerage commissions to allocations of hot IPOs. Friends of mine reported getting such offers, so I don't doubt the charges.
The fall from grace of the queen of Internet hype, Mary Meeker ("Where Mary Meeker Went Wrong"). Excerpt: "Of the 15 stocks Meeker currently covers, she has a strong buy or an outperform rating on all but two. Among the stocks she has never downgraded are Priceline (Nasdaq: PCLN - news), Amazon (Nasdaq: AMZN - news), Yahoo (Nasdaq: YHOO - news), and FreeMarkets (Nasdaq: FMKT - news) -- all of which have declined between 85% and 97% from their peak."
The demise of Winstar ("Hear No Risk, See No Risk, Speak No Risk"), the competitive local exchange carrier that went from a $10 billion market cap in March 2000 to filing for bankruptcy less than a month ago. In February, Salomon Smith Barney's famed analyst Jack Grubman called the stock "severely undervalued" and reiterated his $50 price target. CSFB's Mark Kastan maintained his $79 price target until only 12 days before Winstar filed for bankruptcy. Meanwhile, the article exposes that Lucent (NYSE: LU - news) -- about which I wrote three columns last year -- was not only providing Winstar with financing to buy its equipment, but also other companies' equipment.

Cisco's inventory write-off and future growth projections
Cisco (Nasdaq: CSCO - news) CEO John Chambers should get an Oscar for his ability to keep a straight face as he:

claimed "Cisco does better during tough times;"
projected Cisco's return to 30% to 50% growth rates; and
insisted that $2.2 billion of inventory had no value.
I'm particularly delighted to hear that last point, and I'm hereby making him an offer that would be illogical for him to refuse if the inventory were truly worthless: I will buy all of it, saving Cisco the storage and other costs of carrying it, for $100. Oh, heck, make it $1,000 -- I'm feeling generous. Something tells me my phone won't be ringing.

IBM's pension fund accounting
At the Wesco annual meeting, Charlie Munger railed against the way corporations use inflated return assumptions for their pension funds to boost current reported earnings. He specifically named IBM (NYSE: IBM - news), which he said recently increased its pension fund's assumed rate of return from an already-high 9% to 10% annually. If IBM and other companies were forced to lower this number to 6%, they would have to take huge charges to earnings.

IBM has used many tricks like this to keep earnings per share steadily rising over the past few years despite anemic revenue growth, one of the reasons I named the company in my column, "Stocks to Avoid." (I discussed it further in a subsequent column.) No wonder a friend of mine who manages a hedge fund -- and who has shorted the stock in the past -- called IBM "the world's biggest accounting cheater." That's a bit of hyperbole, perhaps, but not much in my opinion.

Computer Associates' never-ending shenanigans
On May 4, Computer Associates (NYSE: CA - news) reported that, due to a "typographical error," operating earnings per share for the year ended March 31 were $0.16 rather than the $0.40 the company reported in its April 16 earnings release. Oops! Maybe I'd be more inclined to believe it was an honest mistake if management hadn't:

tried to give itself an option grant worth approximately $1 billion a few years ago;
announced an earnings shortfall in the middle of the night over the 4th of July holiday weekend last year. (Hoping no one would notice? It didn't work: The stock fell 42% the next trading day.); and
recently changed the way it calculated its pro forma financials, which had the effect of hiding a huge decline in revenues and earnings tallied using generally accepted accounting principles.

Conclusion
Maybe I'm reading too much into a stream of anecdotes, or perhaps things have always been like this. But I sure have the feeling integrity on Wall Street and in much of corporate America has gone to hell.

My advice to investors is, first, to view Wall Street with an extremely skeptical eye and, second, to place management integrity at the top of their criteria for evaluating potential investments. If there's even a whiff of aggressive accounting or excessive promotion, don't even consider investing.
biz.yahoo.com