Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (43012)	10/5/2000 1:55:42 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Respond to of 769667

I know that. But he still needed correction. As you know, I always allow for syntax errors and malapropisms, but never when quoting the Great One. <gg>

To: DMaA who wrote (43012)	10/5/2000 6:57:39 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Respond to of 769667

DMA, sorry to have missed that point. Frankly, I do not think that the method of disbursement of the "expected" $4 Trillions in excess revenues over the next 10 years (tax cut for the wealthy like you and I, or spending on education and alternative renewable energy resources) has any impact on the SS system. The surplus (as long as the "layer of payers" is greater than the "layer of payees") will generate, for some time, surpluses in the SS trust funds, and I think that these should be invested at the highest rate of return comensurate with absolute safety. Maybe investing in Ginie Mae (more than 8%) is the best route, I would not sugget I know. I was under the impression that that was "trivial". Zeev