SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mr. Whist who wrote (43205)10/5/2000 6:55:50 PM
From: briskit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
I'd like to see Gore stand up to the leader of China, then sigh and huff and roll his eyes when he doesn't get his way. Or better, to tell him a bunch of baloney because he figures he doesn't know any better anyway. Gore is of the Warren Penn school....don't try to improve their minds, just tell them you are going to stick it to the fat cats. I hope Gore gets a writer somewhere to change the "wealthiest 1%" theme that is wearing out the airwaves. So many changes, yet everything remains the same.
So far I haven't seen anything from Gore to indicate intellectual superiority. Any fears in that direction have been firmly laid to rest. I've heard talk about Gore's intellectual gravitas, but seen no evidence. Bush is turning out to be a very worthy choice along side Gore.



To: Mr. Whist who wrote (43205)10/5/2000 8:01:36 PM
From: kvkkc1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Given the path gore wants to take the country in, if he in fact passed his agenda, I believe that the country could possibly end up in revolt in the next 20 years. When people find out how badly they were duped, and the Treasury has no funds to pay entitlements, the opposition won't stand there and take it. I hope it doesn't come to that, but if you look at the groups such as the freemen and the likes, it will only get worse the more the politicians drive wedges between different groups of power.knc



To: Mr. Whist who wrote (43205)10/5/2000 8:34:38 PM
From: haqihana  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
FJ, I'm not the one that brought up the subject of rule breaking in the debates. If it were up to me, I would call the appearance of gore in public, a fracture of the rules of decency. My point was, and is, that you did not deny the allegation that rules had been broken, but defended the breaking of rules to be the "smart",AKA intelligent, thing to do. That IMO indicates that you have no morals, or decency, at all.

OK, skip the lying under oath, and let's proceed to treason for giving nuclear secrets, and materials, to the PRC, or the trail of dead bodies known to exist in Arkansas, of those that opposed, or threatened, the clintons. The list of crimes of the clinton/rodham/gore regime could go on forever.

Yes, all empires eventually crumble, and history attests to the fact that people like the clintons, gores, and you help cause them to do so through the decimation of the military and allowing citizens to behave in dishonest, and immoral, ways. Look around you, pancake, the Vandals are at the gates. ~H~