Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : RealTick III -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: aldrums who wrote (132)	10/6/2000 1:48:21 AM
From: Jon Tara	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 311

What is important, though, is percentage return, not dollars. The percentage return from $1 to $2 is the same as the percentage return from $10 to $20. They both represent a 100% return. Arithmetic charts show a distorted view of an investment, because they do not show the same percentage return at different prices with the same distance. A double is a double is a double. But an arithmetic chart makes a double from 1 to 2 appear to be less significant than a double from 10 to 20. It isn't, though - it's equally significant. $1000 invested at 1 becomes $2000 at 2, as sure as $1000 invested at 10 becomes $2000 at 20. For some reason, it is very difficult to get the human mind to think this way, though. For some reason, we want to think that a double from 10 to 20 represents more than a double from 1 to 2. Besides this basic misrepresentation, the most compelling reason for semi-log charts is that most TA techniques simply were not designed for arithmetic charts, and are completely invalid when used on an arithmetic charts. (There are a very few rare exceptions, which were designed to be used only with an arithmetic chart.)