Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CountofMoneyCristo who wrote (112580)	10/6/2000 12:54:46 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Re: "I should add that I am most very flattered that we would be attacked in this way, by these kinds of individuals. It is a very great compliment. We thank you." Allow me to compliment you again. There are rules about self promoting your business here on SI. Please take your spam and get lost. EP

To: CountofMoneyCristo who wrote (112580)	10/6/2000 1:01:08 PM
From: GVTucker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Count, I scanned your website quickly. You might want to correct an error I found in the first couple of paragraphs that you print: The following "news play" results assume taking all entries and exits exactly as called, trading 300 shares on each, and $40 per round-trip trade in commissions. These calculations assume a trading account of $75,000.00 (100-share lots for each $25,000 in available trading capital.) You may notice the number of shares is fixed no matter the price level of any stock - this is to weight trading in favor of large-cap stocks. As long as you are not trading penny stocks, the price of a stock is not correlated with the market cap of that stock. In addition, by trading 300 shares fixed at a time and limiting the size of your portfolio, you are eliminating a large number of higher priced stocks from your trading mechanism completely, which unnecessarily limits your universe without any benefit at all. I stopped reading after that.

To: CountofMoneyCristo who wrote (112580)	10/6/2000 2:01:02 PM
From: Windsock	Respond to of 186894

Re: "I should add that I am most very flattered that we would be attacked in this way, by these kinds of individuals. It is a very great compliment." What a Pompous Twit !!

To: CountofMoneyCristo who wrote (112580)	10/6/2000 2:12:35 PM
From: Eric K.	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

Edmond-- I think you should share your prescience with the world on your own thread. Since I haven't seen any specific mention of trading Intel in your posts, I started a new thread just for you: Subject 37042 You're very welcome, -Eric