Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tony Viola who wrote (112626)	10/6/2000 4:08:32 PM
From: Diamond Jim	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

They all come out at times like this don't they? They sure do, the count is as nutty as bald man from mars but I think the count is serious. Do you think he'll tell his lawyers if I post my opinion of him? is that legal? I mean I can have an opinion, can't I? Let me just say that my opinion of the count is like the saying "we all have one". jim

To: Tony Viola who wrote (112626)	10/6/2000 4:19:12 PM
From: CountofMoneyCristo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

You must be allergic to honesty, or do you just lie in your free time? ----- Original Message ----- From: Stock Operators Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 5:45 PM STOCK OPERATORS PROJECTS A 300-500-POINT CRASH IN THE NASDAQ TOMORROW. CONSIDER SELL ALL LONG-TERM HOLDINGS. We were early with the crash call to occur 9/22, though we opened down nearly 230. We clearly and freely admitted this here at SI and elsewhere. However, we did not ever reverse our recommendation to sell all long-term holdings. As a matter of fact, we recommended taking MANU October 75 PUTS at 1/2 that Friday, now trading over 4, as MANU has crashed more than 35 since. These were not day trades. We clearly warned to unload investments for the mid-term. We also characterized the rally that Friday as a fake. I would advise those of you here who are intent on spreading falsity and innuendo to expend somewhat more effort in your attempts. As it stands, I have yet to read a critical post that was based in fact or logic. Sincerely, Olivier L. F. Asser