Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (1429)	10/6/2000 4:55:36 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10042

if a women hasn't made the choice to abort in the 1st term A woman may not know she is pregnant for a couple of months, especially if she has irregular periods. The fetal material is only the size of a gain of rice by the second tri. TP

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (1429)	10/6/2000 6:19:40 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10042

And WHY do you say this? Why shouldn't it be the woman's choice? Either the fetus is a human from conception or it isn't. EIther it is ok to kill a fetus or it isn't. All this parsing out of times and dates is silly. Of course I understand it is more palatable for people to kill fetuses when they are small- but really, do you want someone raising a child they would like to have killed? I don't. And as for your "all the children can be adopted line"- it ain't so. If people were in really really short supply, and all children who were already born were wanted, and fed and taken care of- I might have more interest in abortion. But quite frankly with the number of abused and unwanted children ALREADY born- I don't care a bit about the aborted ones. If you're religious just think how lucky they are going back to your God. I am not religious and I still don't care.