Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve harris who wrote (112673)	10/6/2000 5:49:33 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

RE:"Well, I can't remember, but I did find this: aliveweb.com; Looks like the Count was really pushing SKYM that day or two. A longer term chart shows a collapse from 40 to 2... I hope readers were really swift on that one...Jeeez. Jim

To: steve harris who wrote (112673)	10/7/2000 1:20:02 PM
From: CountofMoneyCristo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

My Colleague, Thank-you for tracking down that little slice of trading historia. Though I certainly credit Anthony with being an excellent leader of the short side in the markets, one of the best we have seen in some time, I took issue with his comments that week-end. At one point, he posted that SKYM was a bulletin board stock. He and his group targeted and attacked me personally throughout that entire week-end, a similar mode of operation as we have unfortunately now seen here. That is disappointing, now, as it was then. Not everyone must need agree on stock market analysis and opinion, but it would be a pleasant surprise if at some point discussion would be made on a professional, rather than a personal level. Finally, those I have highlighted as criminals here at SI are certainly that, and the events unfolding right now will bear out what I have said. One thing is clear, however: there are far too many here who have honesty issues. Fortunately for the rest of us, most of those who do spread disinformation and deceit here and elsewhere self-destruct in the end, through their very own statements and actions. And as for the ignore feature, those who employ it, and hide from the dark facts of our field, do so at their own peril. SEC and Congress have until now done likewise. For the government as well, there will be consequences for their passive complicity in this grave scandal. Olivier L. F. Asser