When it was learned that claims against the B&W division had increased last August, the drop in MDR began. B&W later filed for bankruptcy in February.
from SSB summary of what CEO reported at analyst meeting in February after Ch.11 filing:
Asbestos was effectively phased out 20 years ago, when the material was determined to be hazardous. Since 1982, B&W has settled 340,000 asbestos-related claims for a total of $1.6 billion. The entire settlement process occurred out-of-court, through a "gentlemen's agreement" between McDermott and the various plaintiffs' lawyers (approximately 50 control the great majority of claims). This agreement set up guidelines governing which claims would be considered and the amounts disbursed. Thus, due to actuarial projections and the long settlement history, McDermott was able to reasonably forecast its future liabilities, while minimizing administrative costs. Additionally, the plaintiffs' lawyers (nearly all working on contingency), received reas onably predictable settlements at little incremental cost.
However, with the "window of opportunity" closing due to aging of the exposed population, it appears that the plaintiffs' lawyers have taken on a decidedly more litigous strategy. Starting last August, claim requests started to increase dramatically (in many cases by 50%-300%+), although the underlying issues had not changed. It immediately became clear to MDR management, as first disclosed on the November conference call, that a Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing for B&W would being considered. After analyzing all relevant facts, they quickly determined that this was the proper course of action, rather than attempting to settle out of court at dramatically higher sums.
08:04am EST 12-Nov-99 DLJ Securities (Arvind S. Sanger, CFA) MDR JRM MDR.CF MCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL: Lowering Rating For Unquantifiable Risk
DLJ ****** DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETTE ****** DLJ November 12, 1999 Arvind S. Sanger, CFA US (212) 892-3817 Robert Maina US (212) 892-3450 Stuart T. Kagel US (212) 892-6239
MCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL (MDR: $13.56) Lowering Rating For Unquantifiable Risk In Asbestos Liability
Range: Earnings Per Share 2000 vs 1999 % Chg 32.50 - 13.56 Old New P/E Ratios F1QA $0.40 vs 0.55 -27% (FY:Mar.) 2001CYE $ $2.25 6.0 F2QA 0.06 vs 0.85 -93% 2000CYE 1.67 8.1 F3Q 0.18 vs 0.66 -73% 2000FYE 1.40 0.98 13.8 F4Q 0.34 vs 0.56 -39% 1999A 2.71 5.0
Yield: 1.5% Market Cap.: $812 MM 5-Yr. Growth Rate: 15% Dividend: $0.20 Avg. Trading Vol.(000): 355 Book Value: $13.51
RATING: Market Perf. Change: Down From Buy 12-Mo. Target: $24
VIEWPOINT MDR reported FQ2 EPS of $0.06 versus $0.85, below our estimate of $0.18 and Street consensus of $0.19. The shortfall was caused by unexpected losses from a couple of international joint ventures in marine construction and power generation. While the drag from weaker Mexican joint venture results will impact December quarter earnings and a slower recovery in power generation will also impact this quarter, continued increase in the backlog provides increased visibility for 2000. Consequently, we are lowering our Dec. quarter estimate from $0.33 to $0.18, introducing a calendar 2000 estimate of $1.67 (versus our prior March '01 FY estimate of $2.05) and a calendar 2001 estimate of $2.25. Our new target price is $24 based on a 6.0 multiple of calendar 2001 EBITDA.
More importantly, MDR dropped an unexpected surprise about its asbestos liability growing at an alarming rate. Coupled with the company's unwillingness to buy back stock until it understands the size of this liability, this caused the stock to sell off dramatically. At this point our analysis indicates that on a comparable basis to GLBL, MDR is discounting over $1 billion of liabilities (asbestos, nuclear, price fixing, etc., see Table 1). We are lowering our rating to Market Performance from Buy since at this point MDR has switched from being an earnings recovery play to being an asbestos liability play, and while we believe that the total liability is unlikely to exceed $1 billion, we do not have enough data or expertise to have an informed opinion. We will wait for better information, which the company hopes to have by Q1 2000, before we revisit the story.
ú Asbestos liability - a long dormant monster awakens: MDR's B&W subsidiary had an asbestos liability since the 1980's which has been a non-issue for a while since most of this liability has been covered by insurance except for 1979, when B&W had no insurance, and the claims covered by some insurance companies that went bankrupt. However, claim sizes have risen sharply lately and MDR is now concerned about the size of its unfunded liability. Based on guesstimates, we believe this unfunded liability could amount to as much as $1 billion on an NPV basis. ú Other liabilities - not a major factor: MDR has 2 other major liabilities related to nuclear facilities and price fixing which together should not amount to more than $100 MM based on current company estimates. ú Management performance has been wanting: We believe that management at MDR has recent fallen woefully short in terms of guiding expectations and delivering on a multitude of issues including acquisitions, earnings forecasts and now this liability scare. Treating shareholders as irritants rather than as ultimate owners of the company is not going to build the company much goodwill in this period of uncertainty. ú Backlog is improving: Backlog grew 9.1%, with all of the rise happening in the power generation business where MDR has become the low cost manufacturer and recently won a number of OEM jobs. In marine construction, uncertainty about the Natuna contract in Indonesia is receding and MDR should be starting major work on that contract in Q1 2000. ú Disappointing results in joint ventures and power generation temporary: JRM's Mexican joint venture had a loss of $6.6 MM related to some unfavorable contracts with Pemex and downtime on one of MDR's barges, while B&W incurred $2.6 MM of non-recurring costs to exit a Turkish joint venture. The former is likely to have a negative impact on results for at least one more quarter. Additionally, although B&W's backlog has increased strongly this quarter, for the next couple of quarters revenues and earnings are likely to stay weaker than we had expected. |