Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sylvester80 who wrote (56975)	10/7/2000 7:25:27 PM
From: NightOwl	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

Ha, ha, ha, ha! Sly, you are a character. I must confess I spoke too soon. I'm sorry, but there are apparently a few folks that I won't "play with". ...And you are definitely the current leader of that pack. Having watched your show for the past month it's clear that you are working under a disadvantage of some sort when it comes to reading comprehension. I will leave to others your "misreading" of the legal landscape which you are trying to comment on. But don't be dismayed. P.T. Barnum was right. You can be a fool and still make big bucks. Good luck to you. 0\|0

To: sylvester80 who wrote (56975)	10/7/2000 8:24:32 PM
From: jim kelley	Respond to of 93625

It has been pointed out elsewhere that the ITC action against Hyundai is being withdrawn because an injunction against Hyundai helps Micron's Dram business in the short run and so Rambus may want to have all the injunctions go into effect at the same time through patent proceedings. Remember there is not a similar action against Micron. Also, it seems that the French, German, and English cases may be decided before the ITC can act. Thus the ITC action may be redundant effort. If these companies refuse to settle in the rest of the world then ITC actions could be reopened. :)