Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (44098)	10/9/2000 2:59:34 AM
From: Ish	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

<<But just remember that you didn't answer my questions. Were you to answer them, it'd be embarrassing for Mr. Bush. Wouldn't it? >> I don't know, would it? How can I answer your questions about Bush's service record, we served at different times and in different branches? It's like me asking you what my neighbor had for supper last night. <<Whose dodging what now? >> I'm not dodging anything, I just don't know.

To: PartyTime who wrote (44098)	10/9/2000 8:36:30 AM
From: briskit	Respond to of 769667

Party, the combined service records of Clinton, Gore and Bush, 3 for 1, would not have won a sand lot baseball game war. Now, Herbert could play some baseball. But no pride can be asserted if you combined those three. I say that as one who took a student deferment to avoid going to VietNam. I didn't want to go. When my lottery number came out at 284 I entered the draft pool by dropping the deferment. Didn't go. Not proud. Not ashamed. Not beating a dead horse. The commander in chief himself has laid the issue to rest. Wow, three posts in a row. It's a bad sign that I have started talking to myself.