Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (1477)	10/9/2000 12:01:59 AM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

I was on the phone. Gotta run for now: I think he is assuming what seems a better opinion to him between a plan or an accident. I don't think he had the actual proof. I think in his contextual frame...even reason evolving out of natural law, would be considered an accident. Presumably, non accidental is reserved for something that extends from reasoned thought. Hence, when rationality appeared, it could not have derived from itself, not being capable of being antecedent to its own existence. This is what I think he meant. If reason did not come from reason, then it came from random.