SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: long-gone who wrote (1742)10/9/2000 7:16:51 AM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10042
 
California- 1995-96- over 6000 people in the child- young adult range (0-24). I would guess your 1985 statistics are seriously out of date by now considering death for children- young adults has been increasing, especially as a proportion, as deaths due to auto accidents (for example) are decreasing.

Firearm-Associated Deaths and Hospitalizations -- California,
1995-1996

During 1995-1996, 27% of recorded injury-related deaths in California involved firearms (California Department of Health Services [CDHS], unpublished data,
1995-1996). In 1996, CDHS began passive surveillance of "severe" firearm-related injuries (i.e., resulting in death or hospitalization) with resources provided by the
California Wellness Foundation (1). To characterize firearm-related injuries in California, CDHS analyzed death records and hospital discharge records for 1995
and 1996 (the most recent years for which population data are available to calculate rates). This report summarizes the results of the analysis, which indicate that
most of the 21,985 firearm-related injuries and deaths resulted from assault.

CDHS compiles state death records annually from death certificates submitted by each county's medical examiner or coroner, who investigates all firearm-related
deaths. Patient discharge information from all nonfederal hospitals in California is reported to the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, which
makes these data available for analysis. Data analyzed were for California residents for whom a firearm-related injury* was listed as the underlying cause of death or
external cause of injury resulting in hospitalization. Discharge records of patients who died in a hospital were excluded, and transfers or other subsequent
hospitalizations were eliminated to avoid counting cases twice.

During 1995 and 1996, gunshots resulted in 8832 deaths and 13,153 nonfatal injuries resulting in hospitalization. Most firearm-related deaths resulted from assaults
(4847 [55%]) and self-inflicted gunshots (3619 [41%]). Most hospitalizations resulted from assaults (10,495 [80%]) and unintentional firearm-related injuries (1769
[13%]). Lethality of firearm-related injuries varied by intent (assaultive, self-inflicted, or unintentional). Of all firearm-related injuries, 90% of self-inflicted gunshot
wounds resulted in death compared with 32% of assaultive and 10% of unintentional injuries.

Assaultive and self-inflicted injuries accounted for 8466 (96%) firearm-related injury deaths and 10,915 (83%) nonfatal injuries resulting in hospitalization in
California during 1995-1996 (Table 1); 7389 (87%) deaths and 9858 (90%) hospitalizations occurred among males. Although more whites than persons of any
other racial/ethnic group died from firearm-related injuries, the death rate was highest for blacks (34.6 per 100,000 population), followed by Hispanics (15.2),
whites (10.6), and Asians/Pacific Islanders (6.2). For whites, most firearm-related fatalities were suicides. The suicide rate for whites (8.1) was more than double the
suicide rate for blacks, the next highest group. For nonfatal firearm-related injuries resulting in hospitalization, both number and rates were lower for whites (number:
1657; rate: 4.8) than for blacks (3143; 69.4) and Hispanics (5321; 28.9). Asians/Pacific Islanders had the fewest hospitalizations (473) but the third highest
hospitalization rate (7.0).

Total firearm-related injury deaths and hospitalizations were substantially higher among adolescents and young adults (ages 15-24 years)- [from the table at the URL there were 396 incidents in the 0-14 age range and 5, 917 in the 14-24 age range] than among persons in
older age groups. Among older persons, the rate of fatal firearm-related assault decreased but the rate for suicide increased. Among persons aged 35-44 years and
older, suicide was the most frequently reported manner of fatal firearm-related injuries; 919 firearm-related suicides occurred among persons aged greater than or
equal to 65 years compared with 73 firearm-related homicides and four unintentional firearm-related injury deaths.

Reported by: RB Trent, PhD, JC Van Court, MPH, AN Kim, MS, Epidemiology and Prevention for Injury Control Br, California Dept of Health Svcs. Div of
Violence Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC.

Editorial Note:

The findings in this report demonstrate differences in fatal and nonfatal firearm-related injuries in California by focusing on the lethality of gunshots. Fatal and nonfatal
firearm-related injury patterns are different, particularly among self-inflicted and unintentional injuries. During 1992-1993, data from the National Electronic Injury
Surveillance System and vital statistics data indicated that the ratio of fatal firearm-related injuries to nonfatal injuries (including emergency department outpatients)
was approximately 1:2.6 (2); in California, the ratio was 1:1.3. Analyses limited only to deaths or to hospitalizations give incomplete pictures of the problem. For
example, only 10% of unintentional firearm-related injuries resulted in death, but 90% of self-inflicted firearm-related injuries resulted in death.

Some of the assaultive firearm-related injuries included in this report may have been inflicted in self-defense. The International Classification of Diseases, Ninth
Revision, does not classify assaultive injuries as legally justifiable or unjustifiable. However, the California Department of Justice Supplemental Homicide Reports for
1995 and 1996 indicate that 2% of firearm-related homicides committed by persons other than peace officers were considered justifiable.

The findings in this report are subject to at least two limitations. First, the CDHS does not have statewide information on firearm-related injuries treated in emergency
departments or outpatient settings. Injury reports from emergency departments will become mandatory in California on January 1, 2002**. Analyses of these reports
will improve understanding of the incidence, cost, and nature of firearm-related injuries in California. Second, this analysis excluded federal hospitals and
non-California residents.

Few researchers have compared nonfatal and fatal firearm-related injuries (2-4). With assistance from CDC, systems permitting surveillance of both fatal and
nonfatal firearm-related injuries have been developed in Colorado, Massachusetts, Missouri, New York City, Oklahoma, Washington, and Wisconsin (5). Other
states and localities also conduct firearm injury surveillance (6).

Analyses such as the one described in this report can guide firearm-related injury prevention efforts by identifying populations at high risk for such injuries (e.g.,
blacks at risk for fatal and nonfatal firearm-related assault). These data also can contribute to analytic studies on costs associated with firearm-related injuries,
evaluation of interventions and new laws, and assessment of firearm use in relation to other factors (e.g., alcohol use and domestic violence). One example would be
to estimate the cost and health-care applications of firearm-related injuries by including persons who died after hospitalization in an analysis of hospital discharge
data.

References

1.Kim AN, Trent RB. Firearm-related injury surveillance in California. Am J Prev Med 1998;15(3S):31-7.
2.Annest JL, Mercy JA, Gibson DR, Ryan GW. National estimates of nonfatal firearm-related injuries, beyond the tip of the iceberg. JAMA
1995;273:1749-54.
3.Cherry D, Annest JL, Mercy JA, Kresnow M, Pollock, DA. Trends in nonfatal and fatal firearm-related injury rates in the United States, 1985-1995. Ann
Emerg Med 1998;32:51-9.
4.Kellermann AL, Rivara FP, Lee RK, et al. Injuries due to firearms in three cities. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1438-44.
5.Mercy JA, Ikeda R, Powell KE. Firearm-related injury surveillance: an overview of progress and the challenges ahead. Am J Prev Med 1998;15(3S):6-16.
6.Hayes R, LeBrun E, Christoffel KK. Missing in action: health agencies lack critical data needed for firearm injury prevention. Chicago, Illinois: Handgun
Epidemic Lowering Plan Network, Children's Memorial Medical Center, February 1999.

* International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (for death certificate data), and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical
Modification (for hospital discharge data), codes E965.0-E965.4 (assault), E955.0-E955.4 (self-inflicted), E922 (unintentional), E970 (legal intervention), and
E985.0-E985.4 (undetermined).

** California, Health and Safety Code amendments, 1997-1998, chapter 735, statutes of 1998.