Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (25848)	10/9/2000 11:16:53 AM
From: AllansAlias	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

From a big picture perspective, if you view smelly as having been in a large down channel since Mar/00 top, then we have hit the lower line of said channel today. The only other touch was the May low. Really should get a bounce here.

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (25848)	10/9/2000 11:20:07 AM
From: chic_hearne	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

When all is said and done, people will look back on RMBS just like Farrow Tech. Rambus exists, it is a real company, but that is the only difference. If they lose their lawsuit (which I think they will), they will be left with ***nothing*** to support their $10 billion market cap. They might one-up Farrow Tech and gap down more than 86%. The whole RMBS spin situation is out of control. Very few people actually have a clue what has went on and what's going on. The people on the RMBS SI board are completely clueless. Industry insiders are afraid to talk for obvious reasons. In the end, case studies will be written about RMBS. Investors will be shocked at how they got "took".