SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Calpine Corp (CPN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Howard R. Hansen who wrote (59)10/9/2000 7:55:27 PM
From: fuzzymath  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 80
 
According to Bush and my reference site anwr.org, which quotes data from the Alaska equivalent of the EPA, all the drilling would be adjacent to current drilling, and also close to the existing pipeline.

ANWR.org also states that the region where the wells would be built is not "pristine wilderness" -- that in fact there is already an Eskimo village and many military radar installations in the area. The unsettled wilderness areas that compose more than 99% of the wildlife refuge will be untouched.

I have read about the natural gas pipeline issue, but I'm not up to date on that, so I can't add much to your comments on that. Clearly, most of this pipeline would be in Canada (Yukon Territory to British Columbia to Alberta?).

Kevin/fuzzymath