Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: robwin who wrote (33125)	10/9/2000 10:50:51 PM
From: Dealer	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 35685

<Font color=red>ROWBIN YOU ARE A DEAD ON LIER!!! It is people like you that give Attorney's a bad name...... YOU ARE JUDGING ME BY YOURSELF: THIS IS A LIE: I CHALLENGE ANYONE TO COME ON THIS BOARD AND TELL YOU I HAVE EVER PM THEM AS TO VOLTAIRE'S FEELINGS OR ANYTHING ELSE CONIVING IN ANYWAY: YOU ARE A SORRY EXCUSE FOR AN ATTORNEY AND IF YOU HAD A DECENT PRACTICE YOU WOULD NOT HAVE THE TIME TO SPEND ON SUCH AS YOU DO........HOW IN THE WORLD DO YOU SLEEP AT NIGHT???? THE FOLLOWING IS A BOLE FACE LIE!!!! Because Dealer sends little PM's to people telling them that Tom does not like their point of view, or maybe could they rephrase this or that..wouldn't want to upset him...you saw a little bit of it when she tried to squelch the political dialogue...guess Volt didn't like the attention being diverted from him...maybe he should run for office, he can certainly charm a crowd... AS AN ATTORNEY DO YOU UNDERSTAND THE WORD LIBEL??? DEALER

To: robwin who wrote (33125)	10/9/2000 11:11:23 PM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35685

Just the facts robwin. That is all it is about on this end. You can goad me, call me names, inflate your ego with what you claim your pals tell you.... whatever...... Bottom line..... you lied by your own hand...... repeatedly..... for what purpose? Now you lack credibility. How can anyone trust you? ..... unless they don't mind being in the company of liars. I see the discussion has now turned to accusations that can not be verified via credible independent sources....... let's see.... it is a fact you lie even when there are freely available, credible independent sources to prove you lie....... Hmmmmmm.... now you claim things that cannot be proven independently or credibly.... as you know first hand, it is easy to exaggerate when a public record of events exists, so why should we believe a known liar who claims knowledge of facts that can't be independently verified? Should I explain where you should shove that line of BS? BTW, I am not avoiding anything with you. I am waiting for you to admit you have lied repeatedly & make a public apology. Then, after you begin to discuss issues, free & clear of blatant lies & intentional deceit, I will discuss any legitimate complaints you bring to my attention. In the interim, I don't think a discussion with you beyond your credibility problems will accomplish anything worthwhile. NEVER, NEVER, NEVER trust a liar...... particularly one who can't even admit it when caught red handed too.... I don't. Why should I attempt to debate any issues with one? Ö¿Ö