Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sully- who wrote (6826)	10/9/2000 11:18:56 PM
From: Voltaire	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 65232

Hi Tim, that originally came out on the 6th. Robertson is anti RMBS and one must separate the FUD. Here was a response from one of the guys over there that knows his stuff and I agree with it. INTC cannot afford to openly dismiss lower end computers at this moment. Plus even if DDR did come on, RMBS gets three times the royalties. V To: mishedlo who wrote (56882) From: sylvester80 Saturday, Oct 7, 2000 7:16 AM ET Reply # of 57243 Mishedlo, This is the same chipset that Jack "the liar" Robertson reported it was coming out mid-2000. Intel is playing the SDRAM/DDR buster camp like a fiddle and they don't even know it. ROTFLMAO. This is all everyone needs to know from Intel. The rest means nothing. SDRAM and DDR are dead dead dead. They may not know it quite yet, but they will soon enough. LMAO. intel.com