Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Mr. Pink's Picks: selected event-driven value investments -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mr. Pink who wrote (14299)	10/10/2000 10:40:21 AM
From: The Schwarz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18998

NSDR, a Short Due Diligence Report, based on the latest 10Q... Message 14544857

To: Mr. Pink who wrote (14299)	10/10/2000 7:33:45 PM
From: andrew krull	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18998

Mr. P$nk: Any comment on AKRN? I am still holding some. Also is LU still in the P$nk port?

To: Mr. Pink who wrote (14299)	10/11/2000 1:54:32 AM
From: TRIIBoy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18998

Your humble servant cautions you against thinking that this oil rise is a temporary phenomenon. Look at the news just out on inventories. There is a real problem with supply, and it is even worse with natural gas. If we have a normal winter, the price of oil and gas could continue to stay strong. I urge my holiness to hedge his position in HAL with either ESV or RDC. Or you could take a look at one of TRIIBoy's favorite plays: LSS (owned mostly by the Bass Brothers). oil and gas tubing play but has power generation component.

To: Mr. Pink who wrote (14299)	10/11/2000 5:41:28 PM
From: StockDung	Respond to of 18998

COMMISSION DENIES MOTION OF HERBERT M. CAMPBELL II TO LIFT TEMPORARY SUSPENSION PURSUANT TO RULE 102(e) AND DIRECTS HEARINGS On August 10, Herbert M. Campbell II, an attorney who was formerly senior vice president and general counsel of Solv-Ex Corporation, was temporarily suspended from appearing or practicing before the Commission pursuant to Rule 102(e)(3) of the Commission's Rules of Practice. The suspension was based on a permanent injunction, entered against Campbell on May 16, 2000 by the U. S. District Court for the District of New Mexico in an action brought by the Commission, enjoining him from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. Campbell timely filed a petition to lift the suspension. On October 6, 2000, the Commission denied his petition and set the matter for hearings before an administrative law judge. (Rel. 34-43422; File No. 3-10268) sec.gov