SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: qorilla_watcher who wrote (3588)10/10/2000 1:56:29 PM
From: John Carragher  Respond to of 197225
 
If they stall qcom talks doesn't it put installation further behind. something China doesn't want.



To: qorilla_watcher who wrote (3588)10/10/2000 1:56:29 PM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 197225
 
Eek. That's bad news indeed. China has been using QCOM as a chip in it's negotiating stack for entry in WTO for awhile now. Probably WTO entry is being held up on civil liberties issues again.



To: qorilla_watcher who wrote (3588)10/10/2000 2:19:27 PM
From: Theophile  Respond to of 197225
 
*QCOM's agreements could be held hostage* Or perhaps China will be held hostage until they perform on their end wrt CDMA deployment?
mthomas



To: qorilla_watcher who wrote (3588)10/10/2000 10:42:50 PM
From: JGoren  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 197225
 
here is the Washington Post article; doesn't sound good:
washingtonpost.com

Keith Feral, I would not call the desire for a Chinese plan for adopting trademark and copyright laws a "redneck" response.

I agree that cdma can proceed without WTO. Indeed, if there is a delay in WTO, then the best way for the Chinese to treat cdma is as an opportunity to demonstrate their bona fides.