Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : ahhaha's ahs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ahda who wrote (198)	10/10/2000 4:34:46 PM
From: ahhaha	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24758

Whereas halogen gases can "eat" ozone the quantity of these entering the atmosphere is infinitesimal and can't be a cause for ozone depletion. No one knows what is causing the fluctuations in ozone density. It may be coincidental at best to carbon dioxide increase. In any event no one will stop using fossil fuels and no government will be able to stop them. The pseudo scientists who get the ear and voice of the press love to jump to conclusions that this or that is the cause. And, of course, the implication is always what you should be doing to stop the implications of their stretched statistical correlations. You can't put much credence in what they say. "The size is not unusual now, it is the depth. The extent or area is now very near to normal values," Proffitt said. I would consider that as good news. It's also ambiguous. How does an amorphous quantity like a diffuse gas not have width and depth commensurate at least relative to previously measured dimensions? The only explanation possible is vortex flow in gas dynamics much like a hurricane which has an eye. If the hole which is due to the coriolis force has a density distribution different than the norm in the plane, it is reasonable to conclude that cyclonic wind forces are causing the angular velocity to encourage the ozone free volume to separate from its embedding mass causing the ozone depletion to be disproportionately lower at the eye but by the continuity equation higher in the cyclonic flow. They need to measure the cyclonic density of ozone in ever greater radii from the eye and integrate it across the differential tangential wind velocity in 2 + 1 dimensions.