Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (2096)	10/10/2000 11:45:34 PM
From: cosmicforce	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10042

It says ARMs. I want ARMs.

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (2096)	10/11/2000 12:40:58 AM
From: cosmicforce	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10042

Ron, long-gone was advocating that, so it seemed, basically saying so in so many words in response to my "cruise missile" offering. He said: [Jefferson] had in mind those weapons required for us to overthrow a repressive government every so often. Since I've already said I doubt my .30-06 model 760 and .44 Desert Eagle are the kinds of weapons I'd need to take on this task, it would seem logical that better weapons would be required. I don't think it is universally accepted by those in the Pro-gun camp that limited ownership is acceptable. So, I don't think this is a red herring for everyone. Some people would consider it reasonable. Lather said it could be argued, but stopped short of supporting it himself. Let's ask 'em. I asked long-gone for a list.