SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (125774)10/12/2000 5:38:16 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1570760
 
Scumbria,

In light of this article claiming that AMD is downplaying capabilities of the Mustang, do you think Intel is doing the same with the P4? I was very surprised yesterday when Intel said it would not have volume on the P4 until 2002.

Is it reasonable to take this long to ramp up a new chip? Or is this Intel fud to encourage AMD compacency? What's your take on this?


____________________________________________________________

From Ace's (http://www.aceshardware.com/#N15000333)

Mustang core is better than we thought.... (AMD)
Posted By johan
Thursday, October 12, 2000 - 3:57:32 PM

There is more to Mustang than Andreas Stiller (see our previous report) thinks.

AMD is, just like Intel, trying to make sure that the competition will underestimate their new upcoming CPU core. I have received confirmation from reliable sources that the AMD Mustang core has a better branch predictor and is even more optimised for clockspeed than the Thunderbird was. Cool, no?
--------------------

I also asked Van Smith (Tom's Hardware) about the BPU. This is what he had to say:

--------------------