SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (44960)10/11/2000 12:28:16 PM
From: kvkkc1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Neocon,
You are correct in your calculation, but to put it in terms that flatsville and even brainflagellationjack can understand, I think we need to present it another way. Every time our employer pays us, he deducts 6.2% of our earnings that goes to the social security "trust fund". Your employer pays an equal figure of 6.2%, so the entire amount per employee that goes to the social security "trust fund" every payday is equivalent to 12.4% of each employees earnings, i.e., payroll tax. If Bush's plan is implemented, 10.4% of each employees earnings will go to the social security "trust fund" while the remaining 2%, that was formerly part of the 12.4%, would go into a private savings account, in the individual's name, if they opted for partial privatization.knc



To: Neocon who wrote (44960)10/11/2000 12:28:53 PM
From: Bob  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
I stand corrected, I like that better also.
My preference would be let me opt out completely and I will give up all monies paid in to this date, but I understand that there is a need for all of us to help those who can't help themselves. That is why I propose 50% reduction in payment and a 75% reduction in benefits. I am willing to contribute 25% of my govt. forced contribution to help those people.

bobp