Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : IFMX - Investment Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: M. Charles Swope who wrote (14458)	10/12/2000 10:45:54 PM
From: accountant	Respond to of 14631

from what I have read, the lawyers got their shares of stock around February when the stock price was in the $14 to $20 range I haven't received my letter yet! I have also read that after the breakup of IFMX, the database company might be worth $9.00 a share and the ecommence company worth I think they said $34.00 a share Does anybody have any faith in the new leader? Geynes Also does anyone know how the lawsuit with IBM is going? That was the final straw and I sold my shares

To: M. Charles Swope who wrote (14458)	10/25/2000 12:49:14 AM
From: Andy Goett	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14631

Yesterday, I received a letter from the firm handling the Informix litigation rejecting one of my claims. It stated that the reason for the rejection was that the claim "has been found to be a duplicate of Claim No. XXXX." The assertion is absolutely false, as demonstrated by trade confirmations that I have provided to them and by their own previous communications to me on these transactions. I don't know what is the true reason for the rejection. I can only speculate that if the claims administrator is paid by the hour, he has a motivation to operate as inefficiently (incompetently) as possible, once the gross award has been made. Of course, I have sent them a letter appealing their decision. I would like to know what recourse a claimant has if his claim is unfairly rejected by the administrator.