Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sylvester80 who wrote (57607)	10/13/2000 10:22:16 AM
From: Pat Hughes	Respond to of 93625

Bilows purpose here is to provide the data for my Bilowmeter. A mad flurry of Bilows posts, is often followed by a nice jump in the Rambus stock price. His old purpose was to expound on the virtues of his $2.80 trading system. Richard can probably provide the link to that gem. When Rambus does finally clear theses last few lawsuits up, Bilow will be gone. He disappeared after the last 2 major Rambus advances. Others will be gone too! No position, No purpose losers. Good Luck to All!

To: sylvester80 who wrote (57607)	10/13/2000 10:42:38 AM
From: richard surckla	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

What's wrong with this picture... NAZ UP +56 RAMBUS UP +2 7/17 AMD DOWN -1 ?????

To: sylvester80 who wrote (57607)	10/13/2000 11:24:37 AM
From: Earlie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Sly: I for one hope that Bilow continues to post. Whether contributors or just lurkers, most come to a thread, to acquire pertinent data, linked articles that might have impact, or well supported viewpoints, particularly those that are backed with facts. Presumably we all share a common goal, that being to invest profitably. This is enhanced by knowledge. The unfolding RMBS situation is rather complex, hence we need the views of all who can provide useful data. There is no way that many of us would be able to find, never mind access the myriad of articles that both bulls and bears provide. Not being a lawyer, while I may read the RMBS patents and court documents, in many cases I don't know how to interpret them, so the legal types who provide their interpretations are extremely worthwhile. While I may possess a passing comprehension of the internal workings of micros, I am essentially a laymen here, so once again, having knowledgeable experienced engineering types weigh in with their views is worth its weight in gold. Given the above, it makes no sense to be impatient with (never mind belittling of) the comments of other contributors. Nor does the frequent repetition of "dead, dead, dead" actually add much to the dialogue. We all get emotional, but at times this thread sounds like an unruly grade one class when the teacher leaves the room. Best, Earlie