SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: microhoogle! who wrote (45831)10/13/2000 11:21:00 AM
From: kvkkc1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Intelligence gathering is always the weak link in any military operation. The spooks are notorious for incorrect analysis, much like gov't spending programs are notoriously underestimated. I would like to know what the politically correct rules of engagement were. They shouldn't let any boat near our ships when tensions are as high as they were yesterday, without some sort of prior inspection. I wonder if the guards had ammo in their weapons. Of course, what would willy, notallthatbright, or cohen know? None of them ever spent a second in defense of our country.knc



To: microhoogle! who wrote (45831)10/13/2000 11:24:42 AM
From: Bob  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
A strong intelligence prevents wars from happening and thereby saving billions.

The direct result of the buildup of our military under Reagan was the fall of Russia. We outspent them and they went bankrupt.

bobp



To: microhoogle! who wrote (45831)10/13/2000 11:43:38 AM
From: Ish  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 769670
 
<<Are you suggesting a decrease in intelligence gathering and increase in mil spending. A strong intelligence prevents wars from happening and thereby saving billions. Maybe you like to see action and hence you are in favor of military build up. >>

Did you even read my post? I said Jimmy Carter and his liberal friends gutted our intelligence resources. I'm in favor of having the best intelligence network possible. A strong intelligence network makes for informed armed forces. No more blowing up Chinese Embassies by mistake or Sudanese pill factories.



To: microhoogle! who wrote (45831)10/13/2000 6:17:01 PM
From: haqihana  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Murali, What wrong signals are you talking about??? The best signal to send to potential enemies is that we have a bigger stick than they do, and will whip their ass with it if the screw with us. I agree that our intelligence should be improved, but it should be part of the military, instead of the political football it is now, and run by incompetent civilians. ~H~