SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RocketMan who wrote (28208)10/13/2000 6:31:33 PM
From: UnBelievable  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
My comment was not intended to represent an opinion about any particular stock.

My point is simple. If our economy is growing at 5% per year it is not possible to provide real returns on capital of 50 to 100% a year.

I don't think that people are holding stocks based upon the price they are now, but rather the rate they can be expected to grow into the future. As long as stock are held with an expectation that their value will increase based on expectations of the growth in real goods and services that the company can provide. A stock selling at a p/e of 27 will only increase at the rate it increases real earnings. Since an T Bill has a P/E of about 8 a person should only be willing to buy a stock with a higher p/e is their is an expectation that the earning per share will be growing much faster than eight percent per share. Unfortunately in almost all cases where there is substantial growth their is also a substantial increase in shares.

People have experience investment returns that have approached 50 to 100% per year. Expecting 25% a year is not considered at all unreasonable. Baby Boomers or not, that just isn't going to happen in an economy that may be growing as fast as 5% per year, and more likely 3 or $%.



To: RocketMan who wrote (28208)10/15/2000 9:31:51 AM
From: Andy Thomas  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
--Take a look at intc, for example. Its p/e is now 27, with a 16% growth rate over the last five years. --

how about if you take it? the only way those numbers look good is if you've had your mind warped by the '90s bull market.

back in 1989 a stock with a p/e of 27 with 16% growth wouldn't have been considered a good deal.

andy



To: RocketMan who wrote (28208)10/15/2000 10:13:55 AM
From: Monty Lenard  Respond to of 436258
 
Rocket Man, Are you referring to 16% Rev Growth or Earnings Growth? If you are referring 14% (EARNINGS-NOT REV) for the next 10 years to justify its current price. If it can grow EARNINGS 16% for the next 10 years then its intrinsic value is 48 and change.

Monty