SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Line Investment Survey -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KevRupert who wrote (57)10/23/2000 9:26:21 AM
From: OldAIMGuy  Respond to of 219
 
Hi A, We were having a bit of a discussion on V/L over on the AIM board. Here's what I was telling them:

Hi Keith, I find the written analysis in VL to be the least valuable except for news items. Opinion is just that - opinion, and we all have one of those! It's the numbers that I watch.
As far as AIM goes, their timeliness ratings are only a curiosity, not a predictor of successful AIMing. I sometimes use what I call the
"Value Line Triple Crown"
if I'm bottom fishing.

I attempt to find stocks that are on three of their screens in the index section:

High Growth Stocks
High 3-5 Year Appreciation Potential
Untimely Stocks (ranked 5, lowest)

It doesn't happen very often that a stock will appear on all three screens in the same week, but when they do, it usually means that some traumatic event has happened which has knocked the stock for a loop.

If it also appears on the

Worst Performing Stocks - latest 13 weeks

list, then it almost assured that it really got wallopted! It doesn't mean that it's a great buy, but that it might be one to explore very carefully.

The easy way to screen is to look for the Timeliness 5 rated stocks on the High Growth list. It also lists the BETA which is handy.

Years ago I started a pretend portfolio I called "the million dollar portfolio." It contained 20 stocks and was picked from VL's "High Growth Stocks" list. Each was given an initial $50,000 as a starting point and I used the IW value as of their start. I picked the high point of the previous year's price cycle to handicap it as much as possible.

I still keep the MDP up to date and many stocks have done quite well after a slow start. Hard to recover from that first high water mark I used. Those original 20 were picked with just two criteria - High BETA and being on the High Growth Stocks list. Pretty simple. If one got bought out, I just replaced it with another off the list.

If anyone's interested, I could write a quickie report on it and list the results.


Best regards, Tom