SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Charles R who wrote (13942)10/14/2000 5:30:31 PM
From: david_langstonRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Chuck,

Add-in graphics card is completely unacceptable for Duron target market.

I think that statement is only valid for the lowest one third of the Duron's market - the sub-$600-700 segment.

Shouldn't AMD be positioning the Duron as better than a Celeron and equivalent to a P3 at equivalent speed? Selling into the "cheapo segment" risks K6izing the Duron in customers' minds. Anyhow, VIA expects to make this basal segment their territory soon. Do you think that they might have a conflict of interest in preparing a chipset with UMA graphics? I do.

It will be pointless if AMD accelerates the MHz ramp for the Durons, but then fails to up-sell them to the OEM's as P3 replacements. This is where broad-based (TV, magazine, Newspaper, etc) advertising of the Duron brand to the consumer might really pay off IMHO, but they have to be careful to not pull the high-end consumers away from the Athlon.

I hope AMD has diverted plenty of assistance resources from helping VIA to ALi and SiS for low-end and mobile chipsets. I would be even happier if I knew AMD had a high-end mobile chipset in the works - either in-house or subcontracted with a competent design organization. I see that high-end laptops serving as desktop replacements could be a potential lever to pry open the commercial market. AMD had better be viewing this as the real battleground in '01.

Dave



To: Charles R who wrote (13942)10/17/2000 1:02:26 PM
From: TimFRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
didn't realize that there were no attractive motherboards shipping in Q3 with built-in graphics. Add-in graphics card is completely unacceptable for Duron target market.

An add in card (GeForce2 MX) was quite acceptable for me for a Duron system. The system did have built in graphics but I wanted better performance then the built in graphics would provide. I bought the system in Q3.

Tim