SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (57712)10/16/2000 10:54:42 AM
From: Dave B  Respond to of 93625
 
Scumbria,

You believe that it is OK to ship a specification for a product which uses other peoples unlicensed IP, and then expect to collect royalties on products made from your spec- without regard to the fact that your spec infringed?

Read Zeev's post more closely. That is not what he said.

Dave



To: Scumbria who wrote (57712)10/16/2000 11:12:30 AM
From: Ian Anderson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Scum,

As usual you are spinning and twisting the truth.

1) A specification can NEVER infringe a patent, only a product can do that, in which case the owner of the patent must pursue the MANUFACTURER not the author of the spec.

2) By definition the material in an issued patent is published and CANNOT therefore be confidential.

I am sure that this smokescreen action by Infineon will be thrown out pretty promptly.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News