Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (2506)	10/14/2000 8:45:25 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10042

"(which is what I am arguing about not subparagraph 57 of section six of some obscure federal regulation or judical opinion)" Did this mean something? Was this in reference to something? And by the way the word is "judicial." The Court interprets the Constitution- IT decides what it is bound by- so it isn't bound by much is it? That's the way it was set up- your fight is with the framers, not with me. They gave enormous power to the Supreme Court- I didn't. What the court "feels" is irrelevant- it has the power, granted by the document you are such an expert on. Further, ad hominem attacks are generally considered to be attacks that are personal to the man and have no bearing on the discussion. Your ignorance of the law and the legal system has a direct bearing on your credibility in this area. The fact that you think ignorance is irrelevant is very funny, actually. You exact words: "However even if I was ignorant it is irrelevant to this discussion." I am, very truly, ROFL.