Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ali Chen who wrote (57789)	10/15/2000 6:49:40 PM
From: cellhigh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

wow the last time this many bears were out we gained 25% in a week.

To: Ali Chen who wrote (57789)	10/15/2000 6:55:52 PM
From: sylvester80	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Ali, And DDR systems where never supposed to be 2 DIMMs if you'd listened to the bashers hype. I remember as early on that topic that the bashers were making the point that they will have 3 and 4 DIMMs. So now it "comes down to 2 slots" but to the bashers is not a big deal. What a bunch of hypocrites. And BTW, DDR with I not even 1,2,3 or 4 has yet to prove stable. If anything, it has been delayed so much because in fact "it is unstable". So don't talk to me like even a 2 DIMM DDR system is stable. Unlike RDRAM systems that have proven themselves for more than a year, the only thing that we hear about DDR, is how unstable it is, timing issues that are very tight that cause instability, stick compatibilities and that "the ALi chipset is absolute crap", meaning unstable. So don't talk to me about any DDR system till it's proven that are stable. And that will not happen until the name brand OEM volume pushers put their name and reputation on the line. And from what VIA said, that will be late fall 2001 if ever.