Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Lloyd who wrote (28551)	10/16/2000 11:24:06 AM
From: Mama Bear	Respond to of 436258

Another reason not to own Canadians is because they trade in loonies, and even if their value rises you lose money because of the currency volatility. -g- Regards, Barb

To: Don Lloyd who wrote (28551)	10/16/2000 4:25:57 PM
From: Earlie	Respond to of 436258

Mama Bear and Don: LOL!! That piece was a riot. Don, you are obviously an expatriate of the land of ice and snow. (g) Owning Canadians is definitely too expensive. Besides which, they become lethargic in periods of heat (i.e., above freezing level) that last for more than two weeks. Best, Earlie

To: Don Lloyd who wrote (28551)	10/18/2000 1:56:36 PM
From: asenna1	Respond to of 436258

Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians? Eh? Under NAFTA, you can now own Canadians too! The only stipulation is that you must immediately provided them with hockey equipment as requested. Drop the puck and grab a Canuck!. You'll be happy you did. Mr. Tomato Head