SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TigerPaw who wrote (1717)10/16/2000 3:30:56 PM
From: cosmicforce  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 28931
 
I can say that this is highly unlikely, since your imagination would have to come up with events which appear novel to your conscousness in order for you to imagine yourself reacting. The information necessary is far far beyond the information necessary to actualy react to real events.

I have dreams that are MORE compelling in their intensity and content that is comparable (if not exceeding) ANYTHING I experience in the "real world". Don't get the white coats yet, Solon and Co., but MANY in my family seem to have this. Are we all nuts, or is our reality just different for people who view the universe this way?

When my Dad and I sat in Denny's in Olympia, talking about this kind of stuff on Sunday morning, I can gauran-dang-tee-ya in THAT Denny's in THAT location, my Dad's and my subjective, qualitative reality was SO different than that of anyone else in that restaurant THAT we might as well have been on different planets! Sorry townspeople of Olympia, but most of you were not even close to asking and attempting to answer the kinds of questions Dad and I were asking. Not that we made that much progress...

I think some of them were the result of a "too much in-breeding" reality!! <g>



To: TigerPaw who wrote (1717)10/16/2000 3:37:24 PM
From: Solon  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 28931
 
That idea is very close to nihlsim. It is possible that nothing exists except your consciousness and we and all that you see are a product of your imagination

That is more than I meant to say, although people (such as Emerson) believed it.

I don't say that there isn't a material universe, only that the meaning is strictly a product of our consciousness, and that meaning, is a meaning within consciousness, and is a universe within itself. We all know that if we had different sense organs in different degrees, reality would be different. Seeing in 360% would be neat. Thinking the world was strictly vibrations in thousands of gradients, or sonic interpretation, or radar, or magnetism--all would be neat. What would consciousness do with those sense organs? What kind of a universe would it create??