SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: dennis michael patterson who wrote (33103)10/16/2000 9:50:25 PM
From: bobby beara  Respond to of 42787
 
dennis, these horizontal lines are my target resistance areas for this countertrend rally, but i would not want to be infront of any company earnings announcement in october, i believe the risk is still quite high, even though we had a big vix, and putz reading last week (no front page big article on the times though -g-)

a lot of people thought lucent couldn't go any lower and it did, same with xerox.

b



To: dennis michael patterson who wrote (33103)10/16/2000 9:50:26 PM
From: bobby beara  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42787
 
dennis, these horizontal lines are my target resistance areas for this countertrend rally, but i would not want to be infront of any company earnings announcement in october, i believe the risk is still quite high, even though we had a big vix, and putz reading last week (no front page big article on the times though -g-)

stockcharts.com[L,A]DACLYYMY[DD][PA3500!B200!A3700!A3600][VC60][IUB14!LA12,26,9]

a lot of people thought lucent couldn't go any lower and it did, same with xerox.

b



To: dennis michael patterson who wrote (33103)10/16/2000 10:05:44 PM
From: bobby beara  Respond to of 42787
 
stockcharts.com[L,A]DACLYYMY[DD][PA3500!B200!A730!A720][VC60][IUB14!LA12,26,9]



To: dennis michael patterson who wrote (33103)10/16/2000 10:08:51 PM
From: Les H  Respond to of 42787
 
Sounds like flaky advice. Either you're on the right side of a W double-bottom, or you're not. If he's making reference to a V single-bottom, then the first observation is clearly inaccurate or at best premature.



To: dennis michael patterson who wrote (33103)10/17/2000 9:05:25 AM
From: Paul Shread  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42787
 
BVSN in the S&P? Sheer lunacy. Company has made a lot of missteps. JNPR would have been a much better choice. Gotta wonder what's going on over at S&P.

BroadVision (BVSN) 23 13/16 +1 13/16: -- Update -- Company to replace PaineWebber (PWJ) in the S&P 500 Index.