SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Eric Wells who wrote (110626)10/16/2000 10:24:06 PM
From: 16yearcycle  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
"1995 -$4.3 million
1996 -$10.1 million
1997 -$7.3 million
1998 +$4.0 million
1999 +$18.8 million

Granted they were profitable in fiscal years 1998 and 1999. But it looks like they are headed for a loss this year - unless they can pull out a positive $44 million in net income for the last two quarters.

Let me know if I'm missing something on BroadVision here"

------------------------------------------------------

You may be, but you know better than I. I'd focus really closely on those Nineteen Ninety five and Nineteen Ninety six and Nineteen ninety seven results. Maybe '98 if you have the time. Be sure to ignore why there is a reported loss on July 20th, 2000.

I like BVSN mainly because the ceo seems like a good guy.
He wasn't a real good speaker, but I guess that doesn't matter much. He may be a vegatarian too. You got to look at that as an indicator.

As far as Vign goes, I just like the name.



To: Eric Wells who wrote (110626)10/18/2000 10:50:00 AM
From: H James Morris  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 164684
 
Eric, could the clowns be wrong?
aolsnapshot.fool.com
Btw
The fact is this is the first down turn the clowns have ever experienced.