SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: microhoogle! who wrote (47520)10/17/2000 9:08:32 AM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 769667
 
Report: Texas is nation's worst air polluter

DALLAS (AP) — Texas leads the nation in the number of smog polluters in violation
of federal air standards, an environmental group said in a report released late Monday
that was based on Environmental Protection Agency figures.

Of 556 polluters in areas of Texas that don't meet basic clear air standards, 93 are
violating laws established by the federal Clean Air Act, according to the report by the
Washington-based Environmental Working Group.

Texas has 2 times as many violators as the second worst state, Illinois, where 38 out
of 367 polluters are reportedly violating federal standards.

Gov. George W. Bush's presidential campaign immediately dismissed the report as
''bogus.''

''They may have taken EPA data but they have manipulated it and reworded it to suit
their needs,'' said campaign spokesman Ray Sullivan.

He defended Bush's environmental record, saying industrial emissions fell under his
leadership and two laws strengthening clean air enforcement were passed. Sullivan
said the state recently submitted plans to the EPA to reduce industrial emissions in
Dallas and Houston by 90%.

The EPA released the information to the environmental group on Monday, group
spokesman Richard Wiles said. The figures reflect the end of the federal fiscal year on
Sept. 30, he said.

The group was promoting the figures as a warning about the possible environmental
consequences of a Bush presidency, and say they indicate why Houston surpassed
Los Angeles last year as the nation's smoggiest city.

California has 611 polluters in areas that don't meet clean air standards, but only four
are violating the federal standards, according to the figures.

''I think it's a very poor indicator of the attitude of environmental law enforcement of a
national basis,'' group spokeswoman Laura Chapin said of Texas.

Group members say the contrast indicates the culprit is not Texas being a large
industrial state, as Bush has claimed in the past, but his administration's failure to
enforce laws.

''It's important that we set the record straight on what the fact of the matter is in
Texas,'' Wiles said.

Telephone messages left Monday with rival Al Gore's campaign were not immediately
returned.

Last week, when Gore running mate Joseph Lieberman toured Bush's former
hometown of McAllen, he criticized the governor's environmental record, saying
Texas has ranked worst in the country for releases of air pollutants during Bush's 5{
years in office.

Sullivan called the report ''a fatally flawed document which was leaked in the middle of
the night using false data to score partisan political points.''

Wiles denied politics was the main reason behind the report's release, given
Tuesday's third and final presidential debate in St. Louis.

But he told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch the motive was political.

''People need to know what a Bush EPA would look like,'' Wiles told the newspaper.
''Texas is the smoggiest state in the country and Houston is the smoggiest city
because, under Bush, Texas doesn't enforce clean air laws against big industrial
polluters.''

Wiles said the EWG does not endorse presidential candidates.

In the last presidential debate, Bush said states should have more control in enforcing
federal pollution guidelines.

''But that's exactly what we don't need right now - the states are out of control,'' Wiles
said.
usatoday.com



To: microhoogle! who wrote (47520)10/17/2000 9:42:23 AM
From: Ish  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
<<You would have seen more dead with more guns.>>

Since you are so concerned you should go over there and start taking away guns. I'm sure the two armies will hand them to you with out a question.