Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Andreas who wrote (85633)	10/17/2000 1:01:09 PM
From: Night Writer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97611

Andreas, Toooo many people hanging their hat on INTC for good news. INTC has warned and having tec problems with some chips. I think we are in bad shape if the market is counting on INTC. NW

To: Andreas who wrote (85633)	10/17/2000 2:22:45 PM
From: Elwood P. Dowd	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 97611

>>>logical happens like Ralph Nader<< Boy, talk about an oxymoron! Why would anyone want Ralph Nader? He'd probably come out to my house and confiscate my vintage Corvair. I'd rather have 4 years of Tom Selleck, Michael Douglas, Martin Sheen, Charlton Heston, etc. The presidency needs to keep better actors at the desk where the buck stops, although I must admit that Clinton may have a future in Hollywood. Like Ross Perot said there's a Catch-22 in the whole issue in that anyone with enough brains to handle the job wouldn't want the job in the first place! I must admit that it's pretty slim pickins this year as to worthwhile candidates. I don't think I'm gonna vote this time so that I can have the bumper sticker that says "DON'T BLAME ME, I DIDN'T VOTE AT ALL!" Hmmmmmm, what ever happened to Slim Pickens? He might make an excellent president! jajaja El