Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hmaly who wrote (126338)	10/17/2000 3:58:38 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1580458

AMD on the other hand needs to gain market share while Intel is weak. If the war gets too costly, it may be likely Intel will abandon the field for greener pastures, because Intel has that option; which in turn would give AMD a great boost in prices. We might get a clue how this will play out tonight. Should both companies live with each other? Yes; but Intel has wanted it all in the past. It is Intel who will have to decide if they want to live with AMD , or pay the price and try to regain their monopoly. Harry, There are a number of ways to skin a cat. I was suggesting that AMD may have been able to find a less painful way. No matter what we say or post, price wars hurt both sides, one less than the other. I am all for avoiding those kind of painful losses.....if there is a way. ted