Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan3 who wrote (114244)	10/18/2000 1:58:06 AM
From: Tenchusatsu	Respond to of 186894

Dan, <otherwise Intel will be selling those new FABs to AMD at a loss.> Do you actually base investment decisions on such wild fantasies? Tenchusatsu

To: Dan3 who wrote (114244)	10/18/2000 3:35:07 AM
From: Paul Engel	Respond to of 186894

Lewinsky-Dan - Re: "P4 better have decent IPC and scale as promised (and work) " Guess what? Your AMDroid buddy says MHz Sells !!! Does AMD publish their IPC numbers ? Didn't think so. As long as Intel's Pentium 4 WORKS properly, runs at 1.4 GHz and equals AMD's highest GHz CPU in most benchmarks - and kicks the ThumperTurd's ass around the block on a few others - the Pentium 4 will do just fine. Your problem, Monica, will be evident when Intel reveals just how fast - in GHz - the Pentium 4 really goes. And remember this - the 1.4 GHz - and 1.7 GHz Pentium 4 for early next year - will all be done on an aluminum process - with NO BENEFIT of copper metallization. Ask yourself this, Danny Boy - if the Pentium 4 hits 1.7 GHz on an Aluminum/0.18 Micron process, just what will it do when it is running in one of those FOUR NEW FABS on an All Copper/0.13 micron process? Something for you to think about, Monica. Paul