SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mr. Pink's Picks: selected event-driven value investments -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mr. Pink who wrote (14363)10/19/2000 10:52:13 AM
From: Graeme Smith  Respond to of 18998
 
Mr Pink,

Thoughts on TRIH merger, I believe one of your earlier longs.



To: Mr. Pink who wrote (14363)10/19/2000 11:39:18 AM
From: RockyBalboa  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18998
 
Thanks.

Bougth QHGI. Cheap stock.



To: Mr. Pink who wrote (14363)10/19/2000 3:22:27 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18998
 
STOCKREPORT (NASDAQ:HAND): 'A PDA a stock that sometimes gives you a HAND and may just give some investors the FINGER."

HAND is trading 93 dollars right now. There are a number of a factors that have put it HAND up to these crazy levels, all of which I expect to change.

1. HAND just had a whole bunch of news from the wireless trade show in Silicon Valley this week. That ended yesterday. The last run up was into the Chicago trade show. Yes there will be more shows, but for the most part all the plans and news are out. HAND at the first one put out the 300 dollar device that make it into a cell phone. A big bulky cell phone at that. And this week they announced the faster processor Visor and the color version. The news is out, and HAND's ability to put out product into the distribution channel for the holiday buying season is in question. Yes they will capture a section, but will it be compelling.

2. HAND is a clone maker of Palm, which signed a 5 year exclusive agreement with Palm. They cannot venture into the Win CE devices if they wanted. They pay 13 dollars for each unit sold to Palm. That is pure profit for Palm, no additional incremental costs for units sold. The products that they have are a larger form factor than Palms units, and do not have the designer look and feel of Palms. Remember there will be a Claudia Scheiffer Palm model sold exclusively in designer Aqua color. Putting computers in the hands of women has always taken effort, and Palm has done this, and is catering to the market. HAND is not doing these Marketing items.

3. The big buzz on HAND has always been the expansion slot. However most handheld users don't need this. Adding in a bulky costly phone is not that great of thing for most users. The phone cost 300, and it would likely replace a phone that already is purchased. The small size, which is the main selling point of palmsized computers, is wiped out. It becomes a hold with two hands unit. Traditionally manufacturers are less willing to make peripherals for proprietary ports. The reason why is that if sales do not meet expectations they are stuck with the hardware costs of putting the inventory out into the distribution channel. This is why the game pack for the expansion model is so crazy. The cost to put a software bundle on a store shelf is small, and with the web you can distribute game software for essentially free. The guy that goes with the springboard design, also has access to something like 10 percent of the market, while the software games have complete access. Besides connectivity to the Internet the expansion slot I expect go mostly un used. Palms have ports, and modems like the Omnisky units are already being used, so the advantages of the springboard are unclear, and the disadvantages of the design are.

4. Sony is launched its own Palm OS unit about a month ago. It is currently the Editors choice at www.cnet.com. It has an expansion slot that accepts industry-standardized modules. Unlike the springboard, the usage of “memory sticks” is a widely used standard that is quickly growing. Peripheral manufactures thus can make a digital camera that can be used in the Sony PDA as well as other devices that have adopted the standard. Sony is also a vastly experienced manufacturer of consumer parts, both in terms of quality and cost. They will have a color model soon, and I expect a low cost version as well. Thus the assumption that HAND is the only competitor to Palm is false. Hand is just making clones, and Sony is one heck of a competitor in that space. Sony can produce high volumes of consumer products at a profit, while so far HAND has not been able to profit and does not expect to for some time still.

5. HAND should be profitable; they are a manufacturing unit of a cloned part with very little market differentiation between itself and others. You don’t manufacture a clone and not profit, if you have loses, it means that there are serious spending issues that are out of control. This is not a market share item, every unit is a “win” for the Palm Operating System, the one that HAND only buys to use. That is the only market share that counts.

6. Besides Sony, Nokia, Motorola, and Kyocera are all entering this PDA space with PDA enabled phones. Again the number of entries jumps up, and the once only alternative to Palm is deluded. All of the above manufactures are world class. But I also anticipate that a Korean or Taiwanese low cost powerhouse clone maker will rush in for the low end volume units. Palm won’t allow this until the next generation is closer

Some PR news clippings:

“By the end of the year, Kyocera plans to release its Palm Powered cell phones that run on the Palm operating system. Kyocera will continue to make the pdQ phone originally developed by Qualcomm.

Recognizing that there is a finite audience for its core business of PDAs, Palm has revamped itself in the past year to beef up its wireless Internet service and partnerships. The handheld maker has focused on licensing its operating system to cell phone makers, such as Nokia, and other device makers, such as Sony and Handspring.

Motorola, Palm to make co-branded smart phone
SCHAUMBURG, Sept 22 (Reuters) - The world's No. 2 mobile phone maker Motorola Inc. (NYSE:MOT - news) and hand-held computer maker Palm Inc. (NasdaqNM:PALM - news) agreed to jointly develop co-branded mobile smart phones that provide access to e-mail and can store calendars and contact databases.


So on the technology side you have a clone unit using a purchased operating system, with a questionable expansion slot, competing with Palm and a whole bunch of other world class manufacturing companies that are incorporating the nearly the exact same feature set.

NOW TO THE STOCK SIDE:

The stock has a market capitalization of 11.6 Billion (with a B) dollars at the $93 dollar level. They are currently loosing money on each PDA sale, have not other business of which to speak to. According to Yahoo—
Shares Outstanding 125.4M
Float 10.0M.
Sales (ttm) $172.5M
EBITDA (ttm*) -$20.7M
Income available to common (ttm) -$67.5M
Per-Share Data
Book Value (mrq*) $1.55
Earnings (ttm) -$1.64
Earnings (mrq) -$0.17
Sales (ttm) $3.41
Cash (mrq*) $1.57

So the market cap is incredible, but there is no path to even come close to giving a return (profits) that can justify the stock price.

Maybe it’s a new economy thing: NO simply NO. The only market share being captured is by the Palm OS, not by the clone makers.

Maybe it’s a Christmas thing? Maybe, these PDAs should sell well during the holidays, that is fine, its good. Lets be really positive it’s GREAT. But here is the rub, for every unit sold by HAND this season, they as a company will lose money overall.

Let me say that again, for all of they hype of the holiday buying season, and all the sales by HAND, the piggy bank gets smaller. Call me old fashioned but I want the stock I own to have the piggy bank getting bigger. Businesses are established to make money, not create hype and sell stock. Well at least they used to be.

How about the great leaders of HAND and their desire to see the individual share holders do well. <--- Satire only

Some SEC filings snippets:

A few share will unlock 6 months after the Hand IPO date:
“115,253,728 restricted shares of common stock will be available for sale in the public market beginning 180 days after the date of this prospectus.”

Who owns them
“Of these shares, 102,980,142 shares are held by our directors, executive officers and other affiliates, and are subject to volume limitations under Rule 144 and various vesting agreements.”


Here is 60 Million of them, such a deal, such a deal.

“TRANSACTIONS WITH PROMOTERS

In August 1998, we sold 40,950,000 shares of common stock to Jeffrey C.
Hawkins and 22,050,000 shares of common stock to Donna L. Dubinsky at a price
per share of $0.00111 under restricted stock purchase agreements. On the same
day that they purchased their shares, Mr. Hawkins and Ms. Dubinsky transferred
their shares to trusts of which they are trustees. At the time of issuance, 80%
of the shares held by Mr. Hawkins and Ms. Dubinsky were unvested and subject to
our right of repurchase upon termination of their employment. On July 13, 1999,
this right of repurchase expired as to an additional 20% of the shares, and
continues to expire as to an additional 1.667% of the shares each following
month so long as we continue to employ Mr. Hawkins and Ms. Dubinsky, as
applicable. If we are acquired by, or sell all or substantially all of our
assets to, another entity, then our right of repurchase with respect to the
shares held by Mr. Hawkins and Ms. Dubinsky will expire as to an additional 25%
of the shares. On or before July 13, 2002, the right of repurchase will expire
in full.”


Conclusion:

First for the people that like pictures----- look at this chart, the bar at the end is 115 Million shares unlocking.

unlockdates.com

You many not see it just yet, but this is called a bell curve pattern, yes I know its only half of a bell now, but this is a bell curve chart. Or it’s a flying pig with golden wings flying to close to the Sun---whichever works best for you.

So HAND has a modest float of 10 Million shares now, but a massive chunk of 115M unlocking insider shares, HAND’s price has been pumped up on two wireless trade shows, announcements of “me-too” products, with a batch of seriously vicious world class manufactures also licensing the Palm OS. Hand takes a loss on every unit, and Palm rolls in 13 bucks licensing fee right off the top. The market cap is 12 Billion dollars, and the Christmas buying season is the last one with HAND being the de-facto competitor to Palm. I have not mentioned windows CE, but the Compaq IPAQ CE is sold out across the country. So after the Christmas buzz, the next quarter will not have profits, but will have 115Million more shares. Lots of supply of shares, how much demands do you think post Christmas.

Last line: If I held HAND, I would Sell it.

These crazy stocks, its just a mystery to why such high-flyers come crashing down, who would have ever though STMP would be where it is today.

The Truthseeker......................



To: Mr. Pink who wrote (14363)10/20/2000 2:18:10 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 18998
 
Fool Plate Special: Research in Motion Sickness?
By David Forrest
Friday October 20, 12:13 pm Eastern Time

biz.yahoo.com

This year alone, Research in Motion's (Nasdaq: RIMM - news) stock has been as high as $175 per share, traded all the way down to $23.25, and is now back up at $122.50. Talk about a wild ride -- that's enough to make even the steel-stomached investor seasick! A darling of the momentum crowd, Research in Motion (RIM) makes wireless handheld devices that will retrieve your email for you and act as your personal organizer.

The company is competing in the crowded market for personal digital assistants (PDAs) already populated by Palm's (Nasdaq: PALM - news) Pilot, Handspring's (Nasdaq: HAND - news) Visor, and the Psion, among many others. Its flagship product line involves the RIM 957 (hardware) and the service/software component called Blackberry. For about $500 (retail), you can buy the RIM 957 and the Blackberry Desktop software. On top of that, you pay about $50 a month for the ongoing wireless service. What you get in return is the ability to receive your email from most anywhere in the country over the wireless device, in real-time. Neato.

It appears that RIM is doing something right, as sales have risen in the second quarter of this year to $42.5 million versus $19.2 million last year. For the last 12 months, the company has done about $120 million in revenue, primarily fueled by the popularity of the wireless handheld devices and the Blackberry service. When I look at all of this, and when I see the pictures of the RIM 957, the only thing I can think of is "cool!" It seems so James Bondish and ultrahip in our networked world, right? Then again, it also seems like the latest techno "toy."

In and of itself, there is nothing wrong with being cutting edge and having the neatest toy on the block. That's how the Palm Pilot caught on, and many other gizmos before it, not the least of which is the computer you're probably reading this on. My problem with this whole story is that the market is affording RIM a market capitalization of $8.7 billion, or 73 times trailing sales.

As I ponder this fat valuation and look at the key components that will drive value for the company over time, some serious questions come to my mind. Take some Dramamine and strap yourself in.

When you break down the two key drivers of value for RIM, it's all hardware and software/service. The one thing we all know is that hardware is always a low margin business and not something investors will pay a premium for over time. Look around you. Think about the "devices" in your life and tell me where the money is.

Is the money in the phone or the connection service? Is the money in the camera or the film and developing? Is the money in the desktop computer or the software and service? You guessed it, it's never in the hardware. Sure, for a short period of time you'll see the newfangled devices command a premium, simply because they're new. But pricing almost always forces the hardware into the low-margin zone. This leaves RIM with sustainable growth only in Blackberry and the service.

Blackberry's main claim to fame is that it offers wireless, real-time service for the receipt of and delivery of email from the wireless device, most notably hooking into Microsoft's (Nasdaq: MSFT - news) Exchange Server. Unfortunately, the company certainly holds no monopoly over this type of network and there are few barriers to entry for other players in the wireless email market.

Basic cellular phones are getting into the act with wireless email services, and alphanumeric pagers have had text messaging capabilities for a while. I grant you, none of them are as advanced or as cool as Blackberry, but that just says to me that Blackberry is the leading toy manufacturer right now. How long will that last? I have no idea. Maybe it's Monopoly, maybe it's Tickle Me Elmo.

My basic issues with the business model aside, RIM isn't even the market leader: Palm is, by a wide margin. Palm has wireless devices that can synch email with Microsoft Exchange. The real problem with Palm is that it has no naturally attached keyboard (though you can buy add-ons) and writing in that graffiti is just plain awful. Still, RIM would have to overcome an awful lot to take Palm out, while Palm basically has to sit on their, uh, palms and do next to nothing to compete in the space.

So, what's one to conclude from all of this? My takeaway is that RIM better not make a single mistake or it's toast -- and all of the shareholders are toast with it. The company has a neat product and a cool service that has captured some imaginations out there. But, at an $8.7 billion valuation, how much of that is already priced into the stock?



To: Mr. Pink who wrote (14363)10/20/2000 3:40:19 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 18998
 
downside.com



To: Mr. Pink who wrote (14363)10/21/2000 3:15:44 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18998
 
sommovigo makes a great post. Everyone should be outraged on the new disclosure laws which were so heavily publicized as being equal for all are really not as they appear.
To: Tim Dickson who wrote (2793)
From: sommovigo Saturday, Oct 21, 2000 9:04 AM ET
Reply # of 2794

This is the ridiculous part:
Under the new rules, company managers no longer are free to share material information with the professionals unless they also (within 24 hours) disclose it to the public.

24 hours is ALOT of time to pass between a pro getting material info and little ol' you and me. Enough to establish their position with regard to whatever info is coming out ahead of us.

Full Disclosure my ass. Selective Disclosure with a new time limit.
=====================================

New rules seen as tough test for small caps
localbusiness.com

Oct 20, 2000 09:34 AM ET
-----------------------------------------------------------
By Ted Hughes, localbusiness.com
------------------------------------------------------------
NEWS ANALYSIS AUSTIN, Texas, Oct. 20 (LocalBusiness.com) -- On Monday, public companies will have to comply with sweeping changes governing the way they disclose information.

The rules, set by the Securities and Exchange Commission, were inspired by a desire to level the playing field, giving individual investors information that before had been shared only with stock analysts and big Wall Street investment managers.

Under the new rules, company managers no longer are free to share material information with the professionals unless they also (within 24 hours) disclose it to the public.

Michael Noonan, investor relations manager at Pierpont Communications, said it means company managers no longer can offer confidential "guidance" to analysts about a company's earning -- a practice known as 'walking the Street.'

"Walking the Street is out," Noonan told a group of company managers at a meeting in Austin Thursday sponsored by the Technical Business Network.

Investor relations professionals, analysts, lawyers and business managers split on who, if anyone, will benefit most from the new rules.

"The road to hell is paved with good intentions," veteran Wall Street analyst Jim Poyner told LocalBusiness.com.

Many companies, especially the smaller ones, will be reticent to share useful information under the new rules, said Poyner, who covers tech stocks for New York-based C.E. Unterberg Towbin.

Even at large companies, managers already are holding back.

In a Hewlett-Packard conference call a few days ago, Poyner said, senior managers announced they will no longer give detailed divisional sales data. They said new disclosure rules prompted their decision.

"That was in a conference call," Poyner said, one of the many public settings where the new rules specifically say a company is free to give as much detail as it wishes.

Poyner and others say that if managers clam up, it means a rule aimed at leveling the playing field might just end up making the game a whole lot less interesting in the process.

"This specious new openness means, net-net, there will be less information for everybody," Poyner said. "You simply will reduce everything to the lowest common denominator."

Bigger companies kept information pretty close to the vest under the old rules, Poyner said, so the rule change is less noticeable for them.

"In smaller companies, you've got CEOs who are used to letting their hair down a bit. Under Reg FD (as the fair disclosure rules are known), they will freeze up."

The new rules also expose them to a new set of critics.

"They will be much more subject to the whims of (online) chat rooms. Reg FD is going to make it more onerous to respond to casual rumor," Poyner said. "If they clam up, there will be more ammunition for frivolous shareholder suits. The lawyers are the ones benefiting from this."

The new rules will ultimately drive investors away from smaller companies, Jeff Dabbs, analyst at San Antonio-based Kercheville & Co., told LocalBusiness.com.

"It is the exact opposite effect of what (SEC) Chairman Levitt was trying to do."

If analysts are not able to talk with company managers and revise earnings estimates, there will be a lot more surprises, Dabbs said. And more surprises will mean more price volatility.

"Creating interest in the company might wane," said Bob Litschi, Austin area partner at Tatum CFO Partners. "It will be a real struggle for CFOs and CEOs of small companies."

But overall, Litschi said, the new rules will be good for the market and ultimately good for the companies. "To make the transition without destroying relationships with analysts will be a challenge."

The Internet is the single biggest thing driving the SEC rules change, said Rowland Cook, an Austin-based lawyer with Jenkins & Gilchrist.

Cook, who formerly worked at the SEC, said the new rules recognize that "you can get it all out at the same time and in some level of detail."
......



To: Mr. Pink who wrote (14363)10/23/2000 12:22:47 PM
From: TRIIBoy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18998
 
Someone agrees with his holiness on VC:

thestreet.com



To: Mr. Pink who wrote (14363)10/23/2000 4:09:00 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 18998
 
HAND Follow-up Message 14642066



To: Mr. Pink who wrote (14363)10/23/2000 4:09:46 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 18998
 
HAND Follow up report (continued) Message 14642097