SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: haqihana who wrote (48801)10/18/2000 11:37:43 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 769667
 
This something you should read.
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- It's no coincidence that the Yankees won the American League pennant the same night Al Gore won the third debate. In both cases, the world champions finally showed their stuff.

Actually, Gore didn't just win Tuesday night's encounter. He owned it from the very beginning: taking charge, challenging every assertion made by his opponent, breaking the rules where necessary, making his points clearly and forcefully.

From Democrats around the country, there were audible sighs of relief. He's back, they said. The old, aggressive Al Gore we knew is back. He didn't have a lobotomy, after all

.
And they're right. If Gore had performed as well in the first two debates, this campaign would have been over a long time ago.

George Bush, by contrast, appeared tentative, if not somnolent: unsure of himself and the issues. Instead of responding to many of Gore's jabs, he sat there like a bump on a log. Or, worse yet, he whined to moderator Jim Lehrer about having to answer Gore's direct questions. He didn't even belong on the same stage.

Unfortunately for Bush, this third and final debate underscored both the prime ingredient for the presidency and the major difference between the two candidates: experience. Gore has it, and Bush does not.

Bush's lack of experience has long been his Achilles' heel, but it was never so apparent -- because Gore never made it apparent. That changed Tuesday night.

By repeatedly pushing him on specifics, Gore exposed Bush for what he really is: a phony. A man who can cram for a final exam, or debate, but still not understand the issues. A candidate who can talk generalities, in the most annoying monotone, but just can't grasp the details. Someone who pretends to be what he is not.

Bush claimed to support a national patients' bill of rights, but when Gore pressed him on whether he backed the stronger version, the Dingell-Norwood legislation backed by consumer groups, and not the weaker bill endorsed by drug companies, the governor complained about "this kind of Washington, D.C., focus, it's in this committee, or it's got this sponsor" -- as if it makes no difference. It does. Bush just doesn't get it.

Bush claimed to support something called "affirmative access", but said he could never support affirmative action because he was against numerical quotas. When Gore correctly pointed out that argument was a red herring, because quotas were no longer legal. "Do you support affirmative action, as approved by the Supreme Court?", Gore asked. Instead of answering, Bush complained to Lehrer that Gore was breaking the rules.

But nowhere is Bush's lack of experience more obvious, nor more critical, than on foreign policy. Especially when contrasted with Gore. Asked what would qualify him to resolve the conflict in the Middle East, Gore rattled off an impressive string of accomplishments and experience -- from volunteering to serve in Vietnam to helping hammer together the most recent Middle East peace summit.

Bush bragged: "I've been a leader." Meaning: he's been governor of Texas, since that is his only record of public service. He's lucky the audience didn't break out laughing.

As governor, Bush has zero foreign policy experience, except for occasional, perfunctory meetings with Mexican officials, standard fare for any border state governor, but surely no preparation for brokering a tough agreement between Israeli Prime Minister Barak and Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat.

Even on issues he did deal with as governor, Bush inflates his record. Tuesday night, he claimed he had brought Republicans and Democrats together to enact the Texas version of a patients bill of rights. Not true. The first year the Texas Legislature passed a patients bill of rights, Bush vetoed it. The next year, he did nothing to support the bill, even opposed several provisions -- and finally let the bill become law without his signature. His belated claim of fathership for the measure is just another Texan tall tale.

Normally, the third presidential debate doesn't mean much because voters have already made up their minds. But, with such a tight race, and so many undecided voters, this year's experience could prove decisive indeed. Tuesday's debate left no doubt. Al Gore is qualified and ready to become president. George W. Bush is not. Let the voters decide.


EUROPE'S VIEW
Where do Bush and Gore stand on issues of importance to Europe? Launch our Interactive Guide.

POLLS
View the latest tracking poll or dig into our poll archives.

WHAT'S AT STAKE
What's at stake in Election 2000
Senate Overview
House Overview
Governors Overview
Top races for governor
Top Senate races
Top House races

VIDEO
Watch selected policy speeches and campaign commercials from the major presidential candidates.

WHERE THEY STAND
See where George W. Bush and Al Gore stand on the major issues.

THE STATES
Who are your elected officials? What is the past presidential vote and number of electoral votes in your state? What are the presidential primary results and exit polls? Find out with these state political and election facts.

ELECTION GUIDE
Get Election 2000 zip code searchable candidate biographies and other material for races for governor, Senate and House in our Election Guide.

FOLLOW THE MONEY
How much money have the candidates raised? Here are their quarterly reports to the Federal Election Commission.

RACES
If you need to know who's up in 2000 and what seats are open, launch this quick guide.

WEB WHITE AND BLUE
Allpolitics.com is a partner in the Web White and Blue rolling cyber-debate, a daily online exchange among the major presidential candidates. Look for twice-daily updates Sunday through Friday until election day.




Chat
Message boards
Feedback





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



To: haqihana who wrote (48801)10/19/2000 1:13:36 AM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 769667
 
Whopper Al's latest debate...This could be a record even for Whopper Al! And I haven't even seen an analysis done on his army division statement yet.
_______________________________________________________

Whopper 1. "But if you will forgive me, I would like to say something right now at the beginning of this debate, following on the moment of silence for Mel Carnahan and Randy Carnahan and Chris Sifford.

Tipper and I were good friends with Mel and Randy. And I know that all of us here want to extend our sympathy and condolences to Jean and the family and to the Sifford family. And I'd just like to say that this debate in a way is a living tribute to Mel Carnahan because he loved the vigorous discussion of ideas in our democracy. He was a fantastic governor of Missouri. This state became one of the top five in the nation for health care coverage for children under his leadership, one of the best in advancing all kinds of benefits for children to grow up healthy and strong.

And, of course, this debate also takes place at a time when the tragedy of the USS Cole is on our minds and hearts.

And insofar as the memorial service is tomorrow, I would like to also extend sympathy to the families of those who have died and those who are still missing and the injured."

Reality:

The problem here is that Mel Carnahan's son was named Roger, not Randy.!

Whopper #2... “But they [the pharmaceutical industry] are now spending more money on advertising and promotion -- you see all these ads -- than they are on research and development. And they're trying to artificially extend the monopoly patent protection so they can keep charging these very high prices.” Presidential debate, October 17, 2000

Reality

According to the highly respected Kaiser Family Foundation, an oft-cited source by the Gore campaign, a July 2000 report found that in 1998 pharmaceutical companies spend $5.7 billion per year on "detailing" where a company representative makes personal selling visits to physicians and hospitals and $1.3 billion in 1998 on direct-to-consumer advertising.

Similarly, during that same year, the report found that the pharmaceutical industry spent $21 billion on research and development activities. --Prescription Drug Trends, The Kaiser Family Foundation, July 2000

Whopper 3

“Now, I said there was a contrast. Governor Bush is for vouchers. And in his plan, he proposes to drain more money, more taxpayer money, out of the public schools for private school vouchers than all of the money that he proposes in his entire budget for public schools themselves. And only one in 20 students would be eligible for these vouchers, and they wouldn't even pay the full tuition to private school.”

Reality:

Governor Bush proposes to spend $280 billion on elementary and secondary public schools alone between 2001 and 2010. Al Gore’s claim is therefore impossible to substantiate.

According to Gore's assertion, more than 207 million students - 77 percent of the entire U.S. population -- would be stuck in failing schools and would choose to receive federal funding directly, rather than transfer to another public school.

To expect that there will be more students stuck in failing schools than there are people in existence is an extreme example of what Governor Bush calls “the soft bigotry of low expectations” -- a lack of trust in America's public schools.

Whopper 4 --Gore is not a big spender!

Lehrer: “Vice President Gore, is the governor right when he says that you're proposing the largest federal spending in years?”

Gore: “Absolutely not, absolutely not. I'm so glad that I have a chance to knock that down.” Presidential debate, October 17, 2000

Reality

There is no shortage of analyses showing that Vice President Gore’s budget would lead to an explosion in new spending:

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget ($1.533 trillion increase in spending over 10 years). On September 22, 2000, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimated that the Gore plan would increase spending by $1.533 trillion over 10 years, representing the largest federal spending increase since Lyndon Baines Johnson and the "Great Society." (“Budget Issue Update, Campaign Budget and Economic Policies,” 9/22/00). The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget is a bipartisan organization that supports a balanced federal budget. It is co-chaired by Bill Frenzel, a former Republican member of the House of Representatives, and Timothy Penny, a former Democratic member of the House of Representatives. Its Board of Directors includes Leon Panetta, Robert Reischauer, Rudolph Penner, and Paul Volcker.

Whopper 5--Gore's accountability plan is similar to Jim Hunt's in North Carolina.

Gore: "Under my plan, if a school is failing, we work with the states to give them the authority and the resources to close down that school and reopen it right away with a new principal, a new faculty, a turn-around team of specialists who know what they're doing. It's based on the plan of Governor Jim Hunt in North Carolina and it works great," Gore said.

Reality:

In fact, Hunt's ABC accountability program has never shut a school down. And it has never cleaned out a school's entire administrative structure and faculty and replaced it with new individuals. In the first year, the law gave the state the authority to remove a principal, though it never did so. And after the first year of the program, the law changed to have the local school superintendents determine whether to remove a principal. And Gore's plan would not turn failing schools around right away, but in two years. [Charlotte Observer (10/18/00)]

Whopper #6 --Gore Supports Death Tax Reform.

Gore: “Yes. I'm for a massive reform of the estate tax or the death tax. And under the plan that I've proposed, 80 percent of all family farms will be completely exempt from the estate tax, and the vast majority of all family businesses would be completely exempt, and all of the others would have sharply reduced.”

Reality

The Gore plan would raise the amount for the "qualified family-owned business" exemption (Code Section 2057). Currently, a family can exempt from taxation $2.6 million of their estate if they qualify for this exemption. Gore would raise the family exemption amount to $5 million. But only 1 percent of estates filing a return qualify for this exemption because the provision is so narrow and complicated.

In 1998, 97,868 estates filed a tax return. Only 902 filed for the "qualified family-owned business" exemption. (Source: IRS)

Whopper 7 -Gore Gives a 34 Year-Old Single Woman a Spouse!

Question: “How will your tax proposals affect me as a middle class 34-year-old single person with no dependents?”

Gore: “If you make less than $60,000 a year and you decide to invest $1,000 in a savings account, you'll get a tax credit which means in essence that the federal government will match your $1,000 with another $1,000. If you make less than $30,000 a year and you put $500 in a savings account, the federal government will match it with $1,500.”

“If you make more than $60,000, up to a $100,000, you'll still get a match, but not as generous….” “If you are part of the bottom 20 percent or so of wage earners, then you will get an expanded Earned Income Tax Credit.” Presidential debate, October 17, 2000

Reality

The questioner who described herself as single is actually single.

Vice President Gore’s tax credit eligibility thresholds for matched savings are for married couples - overstating the thresholds for the questioner by 100 percent. The questioner would receive a three-to-one match if her income is less than $15,000 (not $30,000), a one-to-one match for incomes less than $30,000 (not $60,000), and a one to three match up to $50,000 (not $100,000).

Vice President Gore does nothing to expand the EITC for singles. His provisions expand the EITC for married couples or families with children - not singles. In addition, the questioner described herself as middle-class, which would make her ineligible for the EITC.

In an October 17 press release, the Gore campaign admitted that "single, childless Americans are generally ignored" by the Gore tax plan.

Whopper #8 -Gore Says He Keeps His Promises.

“I am a person who keeps promises. And you know, we've heard a lot from the governor about not much being done in the last eight years, as if the promises that I made eight years ago have not been kept. I think the record shows otherwise.” Presidential debate, October 17, 2000

Reality

Where to begin?

Promise Made: Saving Medicare

“And with the coming retirement of the baby-boom generation and the longer life spans added to that, it is especially important that we act today to ensure that Medicare provides the same high-quality care for future generations.” (Al Gore; March 5, 1998)

Promise Broken: Gore rejected bipartisan Medicare reform in 1999

Promise Made: Prescription Drug Coverage for Medicare “But he also took the occasion to suggest that the [Medicare] program needs to be expanded, citing a study released Wednesday by the American Association of Retired People.

“’America’s elderly spend up to 20 percent, one-fifth, of their income on medical care and prescription drugs,’ Mr. Gore said. ‘So the need remains very great, not only in terms of the number of people, but for those people who are covered.’” (Samuel Goldreich, “Clinton rebuffs Medicare panel,” Washington Times, March 6, 1998)

Promise Broken: Medicare still has no prescription drug coverage

Promise Made: Saving Social Security

“Our Administration will protect the integrity of the Social Security system and ensure that it remains solvent in years to come.”
(Bill Clinton and Al Gore, Putting People First, 1992, pg. 140)

“We must use these good economic times to tackle tough, long-term economic problems -- and that means saving Social Security and Medicare while we have both the means and the will to do it.”
(Al Gore; Remarks to the Economic Club of Detroit; May 8, 1998)

Promise Broken: Gore still has no plan to save Social Security. In fact, the long-range deficit of Social Security increased by 60% under Clinton-Gore

Promise Made: Middle Class Tax Cut

Gore Exaggerations & Embellishments Continue

“Middle-class Tax Fairness. We will lower the tax burden on middle-class Americans by asking the very wealthy to pay their fair share. Middle-class taxpayers will have a choice between a children’s tax credit or a significant reduction in their income tax rate. Virtually every industrialized nation recognizes the importance of strong families in its tax code; we should, too.
(Bill Clinton and Al Gore, Putting People First, 1992, pg. 15)

Promise Broken: Clinton-Gore Passed No Middle Class Income Tax Cuts Exaggeration #8-Gore Says His Plan Adds Years to the Life of Medicare

Whopper #9

Gore: “Medicare, we - I cast the tie-breaking vote to add 26 years to the life of Medicare. It was due to go bankrupt in 1999.”

Reality

Vice President Gore is referring to the 1993 tax hike on Social Security benefits, which directed the revenue to the Medicare Part A trust fund. This vote did not extend the life of the Part A trust fund to 2025, which is the most recent estimate of the Trust Fund insolvency date. In fact, the following year’s Trust Fund projections showed only a two year increase (to 2001) in the projected insolvency dates of the Part A Trust Fund.

The most significant changes in the Medicare Trust Fund occurred because of increased revenues into the Part A Trust Fund from the increase in employment and perhaps more significantly, provisions from the 1997 Balanced Budget Act which: a) made changes to Medicare payment rates; and b) an accounting gimmick which shifted a substantial portion of home health costs (the fastest growing program in Medicare at the time) from the Part A Trust Fund to the general government-financed Part B.

freerepublic.com