Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mr. Whist who wrote (48923)	10/19/2000 2:46:27 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

The UN is ineffectual, and one should view with some anxiety aspirations to hasten the advent of world government. (I don't even want to be in full political union with France, much less the Ivory Coast, in the foreseeable future). But I agree, it is too dependent an organization to demonize.......

To: Mr. Whist who wrote (48923)	10/19/2000 2:53:20 AM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 769667

I focus on Nader because Buchanan is too easy to trash, even for a mainstream conservative, and I think the problem is populism, not "conservatism". I mean by "populism", not the desire to have government benefit the broad mass of the people, which is merely democracy, but the historical tendency to overdramatize the process of change, and assume too much intentionality behind the scenes.

To: Mr. Whist who wrote (48923)	10/19/2000 3:03:37 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Most of what has transpired was neither foreseen nor planned by anyone. Someone like Alex (and I hope she is well) creates cobwebs, assuming order where there is none, and connecting dots because she can imagine something to be so, not because there is any solid evidence. Thus,to her, the Rockefellers and the Trilateral Commission are using the Bush candidacy to forward a plan towards the New World Order, which is both good (for it will impose order), and bad, for it will benefit the plutocrats at the expense of the People. I am sure that she has alternative scenarios for however the election comes out, and is fully convinced that the indecision of the electorate is just a ruse concocted by our true masters. Actually, as you probably know from your own experience, in large organizations, one frequently hardly knows what the guy in the office next door is doing, it is difficult to get a straight answer, secrets cannot be kept unless the circle in the know is very small, and it is difficult to coordinate activity across departments, let alone countries.