Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : GUMM - Eliminate the Common Cold -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hank who wrote (2666)	10/20/2000 10:22:15 AM
From: Bradley W. Zohn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5582

Why would a specialist pay any attention to this journal if it wasn't, in their opinion, a top notch journal or at least a highly credible journal. I find your argument that it "is merely a specialty journal" very weak. If a group of "MD's that specialize in this field" validate the study -- which is what publication in this "specialty journal" would mean to me -- the logical conclusion to draw is that specialty MD's who should know best are accepting that the stuff appears to work rather than dismiss it as voodoo science as you have. Which, incidentally, brings us to another occasion where it appears you may have been wrong (actually, I believe you were absolutely wrong but I am trying to be polite). My original point is that the conviction with which you make your predictions has you appearing a little foolish when things don't pan out as you have foretold. Of course I don't expect that to change as I also believe you have proven over and over again that your mind is closed and that you cannot conceive of an occasion where your opinions might prove errant. It must be nice to feel perfect in your own mind. Good luck with your short position.