Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (15151)	10/19/2000 10:33:43 PM
From: dougSF30	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Paul, Re: And now you essentially do the same. Right, 'essentially' because, in this case, the information copied from the Register is entirely accurate. Are you telling us that the P4 does not require special steppers, or that other FABs are currently producing that CPU? If so, please make a simple statement of fact to that effect. Like this: 'The P4 does not require special steppers.' 'The P4 is currently being produced in additional facilities besides the Israeli fab.' If either of those statements are true, you should have no trouble stating them. You've come very close to IMPLYING them, why not be direct about it? Doug

To: Paul Engel who wrote (15151)	10/23/2000 8:57:18 AM
From: Petz	Respond to of 275872

Paul, re:<For a guy who uncovered Jonathan Joseph plagiarizing the YUK Register, you ...essentially do the same> No, I did not invent a false source for my information, in fact, I didn't remember the source for the information or attribute it to anyone, but simply stated it as fact that P4 needs special steppers. Also, I am not being paid a seven digit salary to write reports for clients who are investing gigabucks either. By the way, the reports of a price war are vastly exaggerated, since the the prices announced by AMD are considerably higher than those reported in the REGISTER, miscacluated by Jonathan Joseph, and regurgitated incorrectly by hordes of analysts. But I suppose that Jonathan Joseph "doesn't do" retractions. Petz Petz