SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (49668)10/20/2000 9:41:36 AM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 769667
 
I agree that there is no clear breakaway, although it is nice (for us) to see the electoral college fundamentals changing.........



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (49668)10/20/2000 9:44:00 AM
From: Zoltan!  Respond to of 769667
 
>>Something else to consider. Sitting Vice Presidents tend to finish strong like Humphrey in 68 and Ford in 76.

Dead wrong.

First, Ford was not a sitting VP.

Second, sitting DEM VP's have lost every race to directly succeed their Prez since Martin Van Buren.

Third, even though your examples were off, the telling tale is that neither man was as unpopular as AlGore is (or their opponents as popular as George Bush is) and that both lost.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (49668)10/20/2000 10:20:04 AM
From: Joseph F. Hubel  Respond to of 769667
 
<Something else to consider. Sitting Vice Presidents tend to finish strong>
*******

Yes but they don't get elected. Check the stats.

JFH



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (49668)10/20/2000 11:10:15 AM
From: kvkkc1  Respond to of 769667
 
Something else to consider, HHH lost in 68 and Ford lost in 76. I hope the precedent continues.knc